Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

All university undergraduate courses should include a period of time spent studying abroad or doing a work placement.

Do you think the advantages of this would outweigh the disadvantages?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Learing is a process of life, we learn many skills are day to day life. Moreover, all unversities give greener pastures to students to study abroad or doing a internships. So, some people see this oppportunities as advantages whereas others focus on their disadvantages. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my own opinion in forthcoming paragraphs.

I strongly believe that it gives us knowledage in various terms. Learners come to know about many new skills. They widen their mental horizon and culture exposure. For instance, if you are students of medicine then you get to know about how they treat patients, how they do surgeries and many other amazing facts.

For enhancing my views, puppils may work with them which gives them experience and knowledage. In addition, a survey conducted by a prestigious newspaper of Britain shows that the scholars of universities who gave their students to opprotunities to go abroad for study and work have more successful students.

On the flip side, some people say that it has few disadvantages.

Fist and foremost, the main demerit is cultural erosion. For enhance, some pupils impresed with their culture and want to adapt it. So, they forget their own culture, Moreover, some stats to hate their owm country and do not want to serve it as they live there since childhood.

In the nutshell, different people have different notions regarding this statement but i have sound reasons to advocate that the going abroad for studying and work placement has certain drawbacks yet their advantage would outweigh the diadvantage

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the task only partially and covers both the advantages and disadvantages, but the ideas presented remain limited and under-developed. For example, while the writer attempts to introduce the benefits of studying abroad such as gaining new skills and cultural exposure, these points are supported with vague generalisations rather than deep elaboration. Furthermore, the position is slightly unclear at the beginning, relying on a memorised template style ('In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my own opinion') rather than organically flowing into a well-defined stance. To move to a higher level, the writer needs to fully extend and support all main ideas with relevant, specific examples rather than superficial mentions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays some basic organisation with paragraph breaks used to separate the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, but there is no clear overall progression of ideas throughout the text. Cohesive devices are frequently inadequate, inaccurate, or overused, such as the mechanical transitions 'For enhancing my views' and 'On the flip side'. Referencing is also occasionally unclear, as seen in the abrupt shift in the second body paragraph where pronouns become confusing. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal cohesion within the paragraphs lacks logical flow. To achieve a higher band, the writer must ensure that cohesive devices connect ideas smoothly and naturally without drawing mechanical attention to themselves, establishing a clear logical progression from sentence to sentence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student uses a limited but minimally adequate range of vocabulary for the task, though noticeable errors cause some difficulty for the reader. There are frequent spelling mistakes such as 'Learing', 'unversities', 'oppportunities', 'knowledage', 'puppils', and 'impresed', alongside awkward word choices and collocations like 'give greener pastures to students' and 'cultural erosion' used out of context. Less common vocabulary is attempted with significant inaccuracy, which occasionally impedes smooth communication. To progress, the writer should build a wider and more precise repertoire of topic-specific vocabulary and focus heavily on accurate spelling and natural word combinations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a limited range of sentence structures, relying mostly on simple sentences alongside attempts at complex forms that are frequently faulty. There are persistent errors in grammar, punctuation, and agreement, such as 'we learn many skills are day to day life', 'scholars of universities who gave their students to opprotunities', and 'some stats to hate their owm country'. These frequent errors frequently cause difficulty for the reader and obscure the intended meaning. To reach the next level, the writer must incorporate a wider variety of complex structures with greater accuracy, ensuring that basic grammar rules such as subject-verb agreement and preposition usage are consistently controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.