Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-05

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart illustates the findings of library users at a university acroos five categories, while the table depicts the satisfaction level of users about library services.

Overall, the full time undergraduate represents the highest usage of library, while distance learning constituted the lowest of library users. The library opening hours displays the highest of satisfaction level followed by helpfullness of staff.In contrast avalbility of journals recieved lowest of satisfaction level.

In terms of users demographics, the full time undergraduate constituted the vast majority acroos library use to 44%, Whereas full time postgraduate and part time postgraduate showed 25% to 16%. In contrast distance learning and academic staff use the library at very lowest proportion from 8% to 7%.

Whereas, in terms of library services, helpfullness of staff represents the highest level of satisfaction to 95% and zero distaisfaction. Followed by 65% satisfaction towards library opening hours and recived zero disastifaction. The availability of books recieved 50% of satisfaction and 10% dissatisfaction from users. And avalbility of journals represents only 45% os satisfaction and 20% dissatisfaction. Relaiability of wifi recieved 48% of satisfaction and 19% of disatisfaction.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response covers both visuals and gives a clear overview of the main contrasts: undergraduates form the largest user group, distance learners the smallest, and staff helpfulness receives the strongest satisfaction while journals receive the weakest. The figures reported for the user categories and service ratings are accurate, and the response selects relevant comparisons rather than listing every value. This makes the account well focused and supported. To make the overview more complete, include a broader comparison of satisfaction patterns—for example, that opening hours and staff helpfulness have no dissatisfied users, whereas books, journals and Wi-Fi all receive some dissatisfaction. The current overview identifies the extremes but does not fully summarise this distinction.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on user categories and a paragraph on service satisfaction. This logical grouping helps the reader follow the two visuals, and phrases such as “Overall” and “In contrast” signal comparison. It also shows some progression within each paragraph. However, cohesion is not consistently smooth: “Whereas” begins a paragraph without a clear clause to contrast with, and “Followed by” is used as a sentence fragment. Repeated “In contrast” and “Whereas” also make linking somewhat mechanical. Use complete sentences and connect related figures more flexibly, so comparisons flow naturally rather than appearing as separate statements.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The response uses relevant task vocabulary, including “satisfaction level,” “vast majority,” “proportion,” and “dissatisfaction,” and it attempts to vary expressions for reporting data. However, noticeable spelling errors—such as “illustates,” “acroos,” “helpfullness,” and “avalbility”—reduce accuracy and polish. Some collocations are also unnatural: “highest usage of library,” “lowest of library users,” and “satisfaction towards library opening hours” do not express the relationships idiomatically. Aim for precise, conventional chart language and check spelling carefully. For example, describe a group as “accounting for” a share of users, and say users were “satisfied with” a service. These improvements would make the vocabulary more reliable and easier to read.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

There is some variety in sentence forms, including a complex opening with “while” and comparison clauses introduced by “whereas” and “in contrast.” The main information is generally understandable. However, errors in sentence construction and agreement remain noticeable. “The full time undergraduate represents” does not agree naturally with the plural category, while “The library opening hours displays” has a plural subject with a singular verb. “Followed by 65% satisfaction…” is a fragment, and the sentence beginning “Whereas, in terms…” is not properly connected to another clause. Punctuation is also inconsistent, including the missing space after “staff.” Build complete sentences around comparisons and check subject–verb agreement, articles and punctuation to improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.