Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-09
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Categories of library users
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The Pie chart illustrates the categories of the library users whereas the table highlights the user satisfaction among differecnt facilities provided in the library.
The majority of library users are full-time undergraduate covering 44% making it to the biggest portion and then full-time postgraduate which contributes to one-forth among all the users. Academic staff covers the smallest portion making it to 7% and distance learning covers only 8%. Part-time graduate covers almost 16% which is lower than full time graduates.
Moving toward the satisfaction of library users, they are very satisfied with the helpfulness of the staff making it to the 95% and not satisfied with the availability of journals making it to 20%.There are also 20% of the users which are not satisfied with the availabilty of journals. 50% of the users are very satisfied with the availability of the books whereas 40% are fairly satisfied. 65% of the users are very satisfied with the library opening hours.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You identify the main user group correctly: full-time undergraduates account for 44%, while academic staff are the smallest group at 7%. You also report several satisfaction figures accurately, including 95% for staff helpfulness and 65% for opening hours. However, the response only partly summarises the task: it gives no clear overall comparison of satisfaction across the five facilities, and it omits useful results such as wi-fi satisfaction and the 0% dissatisfied figures for staff helpfulness and opening hours. The statement about journal dissatisfaction is repeated, while the table’s fairly satisfied results are mostly overlooked. A concise overview highlighting the strongest and weakest satisfaction results, followed by a more balanced selection of figures, would make the report more complete.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a basic, sensible structure: it first describes the user categories and then moves to satisfaction, using the transition “Moving toward the satisfaction of library users.” This helps the reader follow the two visuals. However, progression within the satisfaction paragraph is less controlled: the point that 20% are not satisfied with journals is stated twice, and the figures are presented without a clear pattern of comparison. The opening sentence also functions mainly as an introduction rather than an overview of the main findings. Grouping the satisfaction results by strongest and weakest ratings, and avoiding repetition, would create clearer progression. Paragraphing is appropriate, but links between individual data points remain fairly mechanical.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use relevant task vocabulary such as “categories,” “majority,” “portion,” and “satisfaction,” and the meaning is generally understandable. However, some word choices and collocations are awkward or imprecise, including “making it to the biggest portion,” “covers the smallest portion,” and “one-forth among all the users.” “Part-time graduate” is also not the same label as the chart’s “part-time postgraduate.” There are noticeable spelling errors, including “differecnt” and “availabilty,” and “facilities” is not the most precise term for the listed aspects of library service. Aim for accurate chart terminology and natural reporting phrases, such as “accounted for,” “represented,” and “the proportion of users who were satisfied.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt some longer sentence forms, for example, “The majority of library users are full-time undergraduate covering 44% making it to the biggest portion,” but these constructions are often faulty or difficult to follow. There are recurring problems with articles, number agreement, and sentence boundaries: “the categories of the library users,” “full-time undergraduate,” and the run-on transition into “There are also 20%...” are examples. The final sentence, “65% of the users are very satisfied with the library opening hours,” is clearer and shows that simple structures can communicate the data effectively. Use shorter, controlled sentences when reporting figures, and check agreement and punctuation before combining clauses. Greater accuracy and more reliable control of complex sentences are needed.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
