Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The chart and the table below illustrates how many of the indivuals uses university libarary.The chart presents the types of library users whereas the table demonstrates the satisfaction level.

Library is moslty occupied by the full time graduates and least by the academic staff,44% by the full time graduates and 7% by the academic staff.

25% of the full time postgraduates visits library which more than the part time postgraduate showing 16%. Very few distance learning students uses the univerity library which are 8%.

If we are talking about the table most of the users are satisfied by the staff which are really helpful,and mostly disliked on the availabilty of journals.

Other sections are marked differently on the experainces of the users some are satisfied, some are not and half of the users are fairly satisfied.They need to work on the availabilty of journals as large number of people are not satisfied.Wifi section also needs improvement as its not that good rated by the users many are satisfied some of them are not,more books and openeing hours are in good shape but still requires little improvemnt to turn them into fully satisfied.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify both visuals and report several key figures accurately, including the largest user group (full-time undergraduates, 44%), the smallest (academic staff, 7%), and the postgraduate and distance-learning shares. You also recognise that staff helpfulness receives the strongest satisfaction rating and that journals attract notable dissatisfaction. However, the overview is not sufficiently clear or systematic, and some table details are vague or inaccurate: “half of the users are fairly satisfied” does not describe any one category, while opening hours actually have 65% very satisfied and no dissatisfied users. A stronger response would summarise the main satisfaction patterns with precise comparisons, such as the high ratings for staff and opening hours versus the lower ratings for journals and Wi-Fi.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic overall structure: it introduces the two visuals, discusses user categories, and then turns to satisfaction. This makes the general subject understandable. However, progression within the table discussion is weak: several categories are grouped together as “other sections,” and the reader has to infer which figures or comparisons support the comments. Linking phrases such as “If we are talking about the table” are conversational, while the long final sentence joins several separate points without clear organisation. Use a distinct overview and organise the details into meaningful comparisons—for example, strongest satisfaction results first, followed by books, journals and Wi-Fi. Clearer referencing would also make the relationships between claims easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “satisfaction level,” “full time postgraduates,” “availabilty of journals,” and “not satisfied,” so the topic is generally clear. However, the range is limited and several choices are informal or imprecise for an academic report. Phrases such as “moslty occupied,” “really helpful,” “in good shape,” and “not that good rated” do not describe the data precisely. Spelling errors—including “indivuals,” “libarary,” “experainces,” and “improvemnt”—are noticeable and sometimes slow the reader. Aim for concise reporting language such as “accounted for,” “rated highly,” and “received the lowest satisfaction ratings,” and check spelling carefully before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts both simple and more extended sentences, and the main message can usually be understood. However, grammatical errors are frequent, particularly in subject–verb agreement and sentence construction. For example, “The chart and the table below illustrates” should use a plural verb, while “individuals uses” and “students uses” also show agreement problems. The sentence “25% of the full time postgraduates visits library which more than…” is incomplete or incorrectly joined, and articles are often missing, as in “visits library.” Punctuation is also inconsistent, especially where commas join several clauses in the final paragraph. Practise accurate simple sentence patterns first, then connect related comparisons with controlled complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.