Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 5.5)

This chart and table and that are illustrates categories of library users or library user satisfaction, with percentages.

Overall, chart percentages are divided into five diffrent users, mainly staff and students. apart from that table is also divided into 5 diffirent satisfaction opinions, along with percentages.

To begin with chart, which show 44% areas are occopied with full-time undergraduate. which make it the highest number. Meanwhile, full-time postgraduate stood 25%. part-time postgraduate just only 16%. distance learning courses are 8%. academic staff is only 7%.

Look at in table to show satisfactions in various options to show percentages in three diffirent feeling. as library opening 65% are very satisfied, 35% fairly, just 0% in not satisfied. conversely, helpfulness staff 95% are in very, 5% in fairly, 0% in not. availability of books 50% are in very, 40% are in fairly, 10% are in not. availability journals 45% in very, 35% are in fairly, 20% are in not. and reliability of wifi 48% in very, 33% in fairly, and 19% in not.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both visuals and report the main figures accurately: the user categories are ranked from full-time undergraduates (44%) to academic staff (7%), and the satisfaction percentages are correctly given for all five services. This makes the response relevant and informative. However, the overview is not sufficiently clear or analytical: “mainly staff and students” does not identify the dominant user group, and “five different satisfaction opinions” confuses the five service areas with the three satisfaction levels. A stronger overview would highlight that undergraduates form the largest user group and that staff helpfulness receives the highest satisfaction, while journals attract the most dissatisfaction. Some comparisons are listed rather than interpreted, so the features are not all developed equally.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on user categories and a paragraph on satisfaction. The sequence within each data set is generally easy to follow, and transitions such as “Meanwhile” and “conversely” help signal comparisons. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical, with repeated openings such as “To begin with chart” and “Look at in table,” and the long final paragraph presents five rows as a continuous list. The overview also does not clearly prepare the reader for the key comparisons. Use clearer topic sentences and group the satisfaction results—for example, contrast the strongest ratings for staff and opening hours with the weaker results for journals and wi-fi—to create more progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “full-time undergraduate,” “satisfaction,” “availability,” and “reliability,” and the reader can identify the categories and services being discussed. However, the range and control of phrasing are limited, with repeated use of “show,” “percentages,” and “in very/fairly/not.” Several expressions are unnatural or imprecise, such as “44% areas are occupied with” and “three different feeling”; these make the report less fluent and can briefly obscure meaning. Spelling errors such as “diffrent,” “diffirent,” and “occopied” also reduce accuracy. Practise standard chart language such as “accounted for,” “stood at,” and “were very satisfied,” and check spelling and collocations before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You communicate the figures using mostly simple sentence patterns, and some comparisons are understandable. However, there is limited variety in sentence structures, and some sentence-level errors make the writing awkward. The opening, “This chart and table and that are illustrates,” has faulty subject–verb construction, while “which show 44% areas are occupied” lacks a clear grammatical structure. Other examples include “full-time postgraduate stood 25%” and “as library opening 65% are very satisfied,” where the sentence patterns and article use are not controlled. Punctuation and capitalisation are also inconsistent, particularly after full stops. Build accurate sentences around patterns such as “X accounted for 44%” and “65% of respondents were very satisfied,” then combine related figures with controlled clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.