Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The chart and table illustrates the result of a survey of library users at a university.

Overall, it is clear that full-time undergraduate was the highest unsers of library, while academic staff was the lowest users.In the table reliability of wifi was the highest in statisfaction for library users.

Looking at the graph, full-timeundegraduate used library the highes, it was 44 percent. The second highest was full-time postgraduate, the percentage was 25 percent. Part-time postgraduate was 16 percent. However, distance learning and academic staff was the lowest, it was 8 and 7 respectively.

In addition, library user sttisfiction, library opening hourse 65 pecent was vary satified, while fairly satisfied was 35 and not satisfied was 0. Helpfulness of staff was the highest satisfied percentage,it was 95, fairly stisfied was5 percent amd mpt satisfied was 0. Availability of jurnals very satisfied was 45, fairly satisfied and bot satisfied was 45 and 20 respectively. Reliability of wi-fi very satisfied was 48, while fairly satified and not satisfied was 33 and 19 respectivly.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main user group accurately: full-time undergraduates account for 44%, while academic staff are the smallest group at 7%. You also include an overview and report several satisfaction figures, so the response addresses both visuals. However, the overview’s claim that Wi-Fi had the highest satisfaction is inaccurate: staff helpfulness leads at 95% very satisfied, compared with 48% for Wi-Fi. Some details are also misreported; for journals, the figures are 45% very satisfied, 35% fairly satisfied and 20% not satisfied, not 45% fairly satisfied. Books are omitted, and the comparisons between the satisfaction categories are not consistently clear. More accurate selection and checking of key figures would make the summary more complete and reliable.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on user categories and a paragraph on satisfaction. This gives the reader a generally coherent route through the two visuals. Linking phrases such as “Overall,” “Looking at the graph” and “In addition” help signal the stages of the report. However, the final paragraph becomes a sequence of figures rather than a clearly grouped comparison, and the overview’s reference to Wi-Fi does not connect accurately with the data that follows. Some sentence boundaries and punctuation also make the flow less smooth. Grouping the satisfaction results—for example, the strongest ratings together and the weaker areas together—and using clearer references would improve progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “full-time undergraduate,” “percentage,” “fairly satisfied” and “reliability of wi-fi,” which makes the subject matter identifiable. However, the range is limited and several spelling errors are noticeable, such as “unsers,” “statisfction,” “hourse” and “jurnals.” Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, including “highest unsers of library” and “highest in statisfaction.” These errors sometimes make the reader pause, even though the intended meaning is usually recoverable. Aim to use accurate collocations such as “the largest user group” and “the highest level of satisfaction,” and proofread key terms carefully. Varying reporting verbs and comparison language would also make the description more precise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and more developed comparisons, and most of the information can be understood. However, there are some recurring grammatical problems. In the opening, “The chart and table illustrates” has a subject–verb agreement error; the plural subject requires “illustrate.” Phrases such as “full-time undergraduate was the highest users” also have agreement and article problems, while “distance learning and academic staff was” should use a plural verb. Several clauses are joined with commas, as in “Helpfulness of staff was the highest satisfied percentage,it was 95,” creating faulty punctuation and sentence structure. Use complete, carefully punctuated sentences and check agreement, articles and plural forms. A wider range of accurate complex structures would strengthen the report.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.