Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-08-20

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The pie chart and table illustrate the results of a university library survey, detailing user categories and their respective satisfaction levels across five service aspects.

Overall, full-time undergraduate students constituted by far the largest proportion of library users, whereas academic staff represented the smallest cohort. Regarding satisfaction levels, respondents were generally positive, with the helpfulness of staff receiving the highest approval, while the availability of journals and Wi-Fi reliability registered the highest rates of dissatisfaction.

In terms of user composition, full-time undergraduates dominated the survey at 44%. Full-time postgraduates formed the second-largest segment at 25%, followed by part-time postgraduates at 16%. By contrast, distance-learning students accounted for a mere 8%, while academic staff comprised the smallest proportion at just 7%.

When it comes to service evaluation, staff helpfulness earned the most favorable feedback, with 95% of respondents being very satisfied and the remaining 5% fairly satisfied. Library opening hours also recorded strong approval, with a 65% to 35% split between the 'very satisfied' and 'fairly satisfied' categories. Conversely, satisfaction was lower for book availability, which saw 10% of users expressing dissatisfaction. The most pronounced negative feedback was directed at journal availability and Wi-Fi reliability, which attracted 20% and 19% dissatisfaction rates, respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The student has effectively covered the task requirements by summarizing the survey results from the pie chart and table. They identified key user groups in terms of size and satisfaction, stating that full-time undergraduates make up the majority of library users, while academic staff are the least represented. The main features regarding satisfaction levels are addressed clearly. However, a slight improvement could be made by providing a more comprehensive overview of both aspects without focusing heavily on just satisfaction ratings. Overall, it is a strong response to the task.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The response is well-organized, with clear paragraphs dedicated to user composition and service evaluation. Transitions between ideas are smooth, enhancing coherence. However, the student could improve by utilizing more varied cohesive devices to link sentences and ideas, thereby achieving greater fluency and coherence in the argument, such as 'Furthermore' or 'In addition'. Overall, coherence and cohesion are present but could be refined further for enhanced clarity.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary used in the response is appropriate and contains a variety of terms relevant to the topic, such as 'constituent,' 'cohort,' and 'dissatisfaction.' However, some phrases could be enhanced for precision and sophistication. Overall, while the lexical resource is strong, the student could benefit from including a wider range of vocabulary to describe the satisfaction levels and user demographics more vividly. Occasional repetition of terms such as 'satisfaction' could be avoided by using synonyms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The grammatical range and accuracy are quite strong, with the student demonstrating a good command of complex structures and varied sentence types. For instance, the use of conditional phrases and percentages is accurate. However, there are minor lapses in punctuation, notably with comma usage (e.g., before conjunctions in compound sentences). These errors are not frequent enough to impede understanding but could be polished for a higher score. Overall, the grammatical execution is commendable, with room for refinement.

Overall feedback

This response is strong overall, demonstrating the ability to summarize data effectively. The task achievement is clear, with a good breakdown of both user composition and satisfaction levels. The organization and coherence are solid, although minor improvements can be made in linking ideas more seamlessly. Vocabulary usage is appropriate, but strive for greater lexical variety to elevate the piece. Pay attention to grammatical accuracy, especially in punctuation, to reinforce the quality of the writing. With these enhancements, the piece could push toward a higher band score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.