Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-03
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Categories of library users
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The given pie chart illustrates the outcomes of a survey conducted with students who visit the library at a university
Overall, it can be inferred from the chart that the majority of the users are Full-time undergraduates whereas, academic staff are least . A glance at the table reveals that consumers are very much satisfied with helpfulness of the staff but are really disappointed with the availability of journals.
Full time undergraduates occupy the highest percent of the chart for 44% however, when comparing with full time undergraduates there are only 25% of full time postgraduates. Part- time postgraduates entails for 16% . Academic staff and distance learning entail for almost the same amount with a negligible difference which is 7% and 8%
Regarding library user satisfaction, 95% of respondents reported being "Very satisfied" with staff helpfulness, with the remaining 5% "Fairly satisfied" and none expressing dissatisfaction. Library opening hours also scored highly, with 65% very satisfied and no dissatisfied users. Conversely, availability of journals recorded the highest dissatisfaction rate at 20%, closely followed by Wi-Fi reliability at 19% and book availability at 10%.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
You have successfully identified the main features of both the chart and the table. You provided a clear overview and supported your points with relevant data from the prompt. You made effective comparisons, such as noting the difference between full-time undergraduates and postgraduates, and highlighting the contrast between high satisfaction with staff and dissatisfaction with journal availability. To reach a higher band, ensure you avoid minor inaccuracies in data reporting; for example, you stated academic staff and distance learning were 7% and 8%, but the chart shows them as 8% and 7% respectively. Overall, the response is well-focused and covers all requirements of the task effectively.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The response is logically organized, with a clear introduction, a body paragraph for the chart, and a body paragraph for the table. You use cohesive devices such as 'Overall', 'A glance at the table', and 'Conversely' to guide the reader through the information. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the two distinct data sets. To improve, ensure that your referencing is always precise; for instance, in the second paragraph, you repeat 'full time undergraduates' unnecessarily, which makes the sentence slightly clunky. Improving the flow between sentences would help achieve a higher score.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
You demonstrate a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey information clearly. Phrases like 'negligible difference', 'reported being', and 'recorded the highest dissatisfaction rate' are used accurately. However, there are some minor issues with word choice and collocation. For example, 'consumers' is not the most appropriate term for library users, and 'entails for' is grammatically incorrect in this context. Using more precise academic vocabulary would enhance the quality of your writing. Overall, your vocabulary is adequate for the task and does not impede communication.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While many sentences are clear, there are several grammatical errors, such as 'academic staff are least' (missing a noun/adjective) and 'entails for 16%'. Punctuation is generally functional, but there are some inconsistencies with spacing and commas. To improve, focus on subject-verb agreement and ensuring that your complex sentences are constructed without errors. Despite these slips, your meaning is always clear, and the errors do not significantly hinder the reader's understanding of the data.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
