Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The two charts compare the results of a survey of university library users across five different categories and their levels of satisfaction.

Overall, it is clear that full-time undergraduate is the largest group of library users, while academic staff account for the smallest proportion. In terms of satisfaction, the helpfulness of staff receives the highest rating, whereas the availability of journals has the lowest level of satisfaction.

The largest group of library users is full-time undergraduates, accounting for 44%, while full-time postgraduates account for 25%. whereas part-time postgraduate shows 16% of library users. In contrast, the smallest proportion of the library users are academic staff, account for 7%.

Regarding the satisfaction level, users are very satisfied with library opening hours stands at 65% with 35% of fairly satisfied. The helpfulness of staff record the high figure, at 95%. The availability of journals has the lowest proportion of very satisfied users, at 45%.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response successfully addresses all parts of the task by providing a clear overview of the main features from both the chart and the table. You present key data points, such as full-time undergraduates accounting for the largest group at 44 percent and academic staff making up the smallest proportion at 7 percent. Furthermore, you make relevant comparisons regarding satisfaction levels, noting that the helpfulness of staff received the highest rating while the availability of journals scored the lowest. The information is accurately reported and well selected, giving a comprehensive summary of the visual data provided without missing essential details, which fully satisfies the requirements for this criterion.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

Your writing is clearly organised with a logical progression of ideas throughout. The response is divided into sensible paragraphs, starting with a clear introductory summary, followed by an overall statement, and then separating the user categories data from the satisfaction levels. You make good use of cohesive devices such as 'In terms of satisfaction', 'Regarding the satisfaction level', and 'In contrast' to guide the reader through the data. However, there are minor cohesion slip-ups, such as the dangling clause 'whereas part-time postgraduate shows 16%', which lacks a proper subject verb agreement or connection to the preceding sentence. Overall, the structure is coherent and easy to follow.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary suitable for an Academic Task 1 response, using terms such as 'proportion', 'category', 'satisfaction level', and 'availability'. There are some successful attempts to use less common vocabulary like 'helpfulness' and 'academic staff'. However, there are noticeable lexical and collocation inaccuracies that prevent a higher score, such as 'full-time undergraduate' (should be plural 'undergraduates'), 'record the high figure' (grammatically awkward, should be 'recorded the highest figure' or 'reached a peak'), and 'shows 16%' instead of 'accounts for 16%'. These vocabulary and word choice errors do not impede overall communication, but they highlight limitations in precision and flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The response features a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some control over grammar. You successfully use relative clauses and participial phrases, such as 'accounting for 44%' and 'users are very satisfied with library opening hours stands at 65%'. However, the grammar contains several frequent errors and awkward constructions. For instance, the sentence 'users are very satisfied with library opening hours stands at 65%' contains a double-verb error ('are' and 'stands'). There are also agreement and pluralisation errors, such as 'full-time undergraduate is' instead of 'undergraduates are', and 'account for 7%' instead of 'accounting for 7%'. Despite these errors, meaning remains largely clear throughout.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.