Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given pie chart and data chart, provide information of users and satisfaction of using library in the university.

Overall, the most use of library is dominated by full-time undergraduate students by following of full-time postgraduate students. Other than this, the staff helpfulness is very satisfied by the most users.

The use of library is lead by the full-time undergraduate, at 44%, while full-time postgraduates ranked second with 25%. The user of staff and distance learning were almost similar in figures, at 7% and 8%, respectively. As for the part-time postgraduates, they ranked third with 16%.

On the other hand, the users of library were very satisfied with helpfulness of staff by 95% and only 5% users were fairly satisfied with them. The satisfaction with availability of books and reliability of wifi were quite in same, 50% and 48%. The number of library opened hour were quite high than that of availability of journals by 20%. However, oy 20% users were not satisfied with availability of journals.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response covers the main features of both the pie chart and the table, providing a summary with some comparisons. The student identifies the dominant category of library users as full-time undergraduates at 44% and correctly highlights key satisfaction metrics, such as staff helpfulness at 95%. However, there are some minor inaccuracies in reporting the data, such as stating 'the number of library opened hour were quite high than that of availability of journals by 20%', which misinterprets the specific figures or categories presented in the source material. Additionally, comparisons between tables and charts could be integrated more fluidly to fully satisfy all parts of the task at a higher level. Overall, the response addresses the prompt adequately, achieving a solid Band 6.0.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The response demonstrates a coherent overall arrangement with a logical paragraph structure. The introduction outlines the data sources, the second and third paragraphs focus on the categories of library users, and the final paragraph discusses satisfaction levels. Cohesive devices are used to link ideas, such as 'Overall', 'The use of library is lead by', and 'On the other hand'. However, referencing and transitions are sometimes mechanical or awkward, as seen in phrases like 'by following of full-time postgraduate students' and 'quite in same'. Paragraphing is present and helps separate the two distinct graphics, but internal progression within paragraphs occasionally feels disjointed, placing this criterion firmly at Band 6.0.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, allowing the student to convey basic statistical information and satisfaction categories. Words like 'dominated', 'respectively', and 'satisfaction' demonstrate an acceptable range. However, there are notable word choice and collocation errors throughout the text, such as 'the most use of library' instead of 'the highest library usage', 'the user of staff' instead of 'library staff users', and 'library opened hour' instead of 'library opening hours'. Furthermore, typographical errors like 'oy 20% users' detract from lexical precision. While communication is not impeded, these frequent inaccuracies keep the score at Band 5.5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing passive structures and subordinate clauses such as 'while full-time postgraduates ranked second with 25%'. However, grammatical accuracy is inconsistent. There are several noticeable errors in prepositions, subject-verb agreement, and comparative structures, including 'data chart, provide information', 'is dominated... by following of', 'were quite in same', and 'were quite high than that of'. Despite these errors, the meaning remains largely comprehensible to the reader. Because the errors occur frequently within complex structures, the performance aligns with Band 5.5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.