Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-20

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The pie chart illustrates the different types of library users in a university. The table summarises the satisfaction level of these users in different sectors. Overall one could say that a certain demographic used the library more frequently than the others and on an average the users of the library were fairly satisfied.

From the pie chart, it is evident that almost half of the library users were full time undergraduate students falling at 44%. Full time postgraduate students were next with a proportion of 25%. Part time postgraduate students were almost half of that of full time, falling at 16%. It was noticed that students who were having distant learning courses and the academic staff were among the least common library users, falling at 8% and 7% respectively.

From the table, one can study that a majority of the percent of users, that was around 95%, were thoroughly satisfied with the helpfulness of the staff. Almost half of these numbers, that is 65% were fond of the library opening hours. However, not the same could be said for the users, on the aspect of the availability of journals with only 45% satisfied with it but 35% having mediocre thoughts and 20% disappointed with it. A similar reaction could be noticed regarding the users reaction towards the reliability of wi-fi, with 48% satisfied with the service, however the remaining 33% and 19% were fairly satisfied and disappointed respectively. There was a mixed reaction for the availability of books, with the half being overly satisfied and the remaining 40% okay, leaving the 10% not at all satisfied.

All in all, the full time undergraduates were the leading users of the library, and on an average the satisfaction level of the library users was met with a good response.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The student successfully covers all parts of the task by reporting the main features from both the pie chart and the table. An overview is provided in the introduction and reinforced in the conclusion, capturing the key takeaways that full-time undergraduates dominate user demographics and overall satisfaction is generally high. Data is accurately cited throughout, such as noting full-time undergraduates at 44% and staff helpfulness satisfaction at 95%. Comparisons are made effectively between categories, such as contrasting full-time and part-time postgraduates. While some finer details are omitted, this is appropriate for a summary. The response fully satisfies the requirements for Task Achievement at a Band 7.0 level.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The response is clearly organised with a logical progression from an introduction to body paragraphs detailing the chart and table respectively, followed by a concluding summary. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct visual elements. Cohesive devices are employed to link ideas, such as 'From the pie chart', 'From the table', and 'However'. However, referencing and transitions occasionally feel slightly mechanical or repetitive in structure (e.g., beginning multiple sentences with 'From the...'). Nonetheless, cohesion does not impede flow, resulting in a solid performance matching Band 7.0 descriptors.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate to sufficient range of vocabulary suitable for an Academic Task 1 response, successfully employing terms like 'proportion', 'demographic', 'disappointed', and 'availability'. There are some less common lexical items attempted, though occasional awkward phrasing occurs, such as 'fond of the library opening hours' or 'mediocre thoughts' when describing survey categories. Word choice is generally clear and communicates meaning effectively, despite minor collocation inaccuracies. Spelling and word formation are accurate throughout, supporting a Band 6.5 score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The response features a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, incorporating subordinate clauses effectively (e.g., 'It was noticed that students who were having distant learning courses...'). There are frequent error-free sentences, demonstrating good control of basic and intermediate grammar. However, a few minor awkward constructions and slight grammatical slips appear, such as 'students who were having distant learning courses' instead of 'distance learning' and 'on an average'. Punctuation is generally sound. The grammatical control is solid and aligns well with the criteria for Band 6.5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.