Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-21
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Categories of library users
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The given pie chart illustrates data of a survey of library consumers at a university whereas, the table indicates satisfaction percentage on various categories.
Overall, from the pie chart a vast proportion of full-time undergratuate students uses the library followed by full-time postgraduates. Based on the data from the table individuals are very satisfied with helpfulness of the staff.
According to the pie chart 44% of full-time undergraduate students referred the library. Whereas, a quarter full-time postgraduate used the library. This proportion was closely followed by part-time postgraduates with 16%. Distance learning students and academic staff's proportion is relatively low with 8% and 7% respectively.
Users reported high satisfaction in respect to helpfullness of staff which is about 95%, whereas 20% of individuals are dissatisfied with the availability of journals. 65% of people are satisfied with the library opening hours with 35% firly satisfied. Half people are happy with the availability of books with 40% fairly satisfied. Lastly individuals are very satisfied with availability of books and wi-fi with 45% and 48% each.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response covers all parts of the task by reporting the main features from both the pie chart and the table. An overview is successfully provided in the second paragraph, highlighting the dominant user category (full-time undergraduates) and the highest area of satisfaction (helpfulness of staff). Key data points are selected and compared, such as the 44% figure for undergraduates and the 95% satisfaction rate for staff helpfulness. However, there are minor inaccuracies in data interpretation in the final paragraph, where the student confuses percentages for books and wi-fi ("availability of books and wi-fi with 45% and 48% each" instead of journals at 45% and wi-fi at 48%). Despite this minor lapse, the main trends are adequately captured, earning a solid Band 6.5.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall arrangement, moving logically from an introduction and overview to specific details from the pie chart and then the table. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate different parts of the visual data. Cohesive devices are employed to connect ideas, such as "Overall," "Whereas," and "Lastly," though some transitions feel slightly mechanical or repetitive ("According to the pie chart"). Referencing is generally clear, but the logical progression within the final paragraph becomes a little jumbled when discussing multiple satisfaction categories. Overall, cohesion is functional and supports clear communication, aligning well with the Band 6 descriptor.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary suitable for the task, including terms like "illustrates," "proportion," "satisfaction percentage," and "dissatisfied." There are some attempts to use less common vocabulary and synonyms ("consumers," "referred the library"), but these lead to unnatural collocations or minor word choice errors (e.g., library users are "consumers" or students "referred the library" instead of "preferred" or "represented"). Spelling is generally accurate, though there is a spelling error with "undergratuate" and "helpfullness." The lexical range is sufficient to convey the main points clearly, despite occasional inaccuracies.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The response features a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, such as introductory subordinate clauses ("whereas, the table indicates..."). There are several grammatical errors and punctuation slips throughout the text, including missing commas, awkward prepositional usage ("in respect to"), and subject-verb agreement issues ("Distance learning students and academic staff's proportion is..." and "Half people are happy"). However, these errors do not impede overall communication. The writer demonstrates enough control over basic sentence forms and simple complex structures to meet the criteria for Band 6.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
