Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-26

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 4.0)

The provides chart illustrates consequence of a survey of library citizens at a university and while the demonstrate many types of categories of library users at university, and satisfied at university academic, full time.

Overall, the categories of library people were improved at maximum level on a proportion of university. While, the full-time undergraduate read at maximum level was 44 percent rather than other types of library users. The educational staff was commonly decreased 7% extremely lower than another users at a university.

At a university, the approximately full-time students were used to more concentrate on their read 25% very high compared with tow sorts of users.

The categories of learners were keep distance and student part-time students were fluctated because they were totally focus on their learning skills.

The part-time of library users consider the value of materials was 16%,.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response attempts to address both parts of the prompt (the categories of users and satisfaction percentages), but the execution is severely compromised by numerous misinterpretations of the data, awkward phrasing, and a failure to meet the minimum length requirement of 150 words (the text contains 141 words). While the student notes that full-time undergraduates are the largest group at 44 percent, other claims are confusing or inaccurate, such as stating that educational staff 'decreased 7%' or that part-time students 'were fluctated'. The table regarding satisfaction is largely ignored except for a vague reference to the value of materials. Consequently, the task is only partially addressed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

The essay lacks clear logical organization and progression. While basic transition markers like 'Overall' and 'While' are used, they are deployed incorrectly or clumsily, obscuring the relationship between ideas. Paragraphing is attempted, but sentences within paragraphs feel disjointed and random, such as jumping abruptly between user categories and satisfaction data without a clear structure. Referencing and cohesive devices are frequently faulty or mechanical, making the overall flow very difficult for the reader to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is very limited and frequently unnatural or inappropriate. Phrases like 'library citizens', 'library people', and 'educational staff' demonstrate a poor grasp of standard academic collocations. There are also numerous word-choice and form errors, such as 'consequence' instead of 'proportion' or 'data', and 'fluctated' instead of fluctuating. While the student attempts to use less common vocabulary, the frequent inaccuracies and misuse of terms significantly impede communication and strain the reader.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0

Grammatical control is weak throughout the response. The text is plagued by severe structural errors, incorrect verb tenses, and missing or misplaced constituents, as seen in the opening sentence: 'The provides chart illustrates consequence of a survey of library citizens at a university and while the demonstrate many types...'. Complex sentence forms are attempted but are almost uniformly faulty. Simple sentences often contain basic agreement or preposition errors, resulting in frequent grammatical breakdowns that impede understanding.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.