Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-27

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The pie chart and table graph illustrate the outcomes of a research of library clients at a university.

Overall, the most of the users are from full-time undergraduate level and dominent the chart. And, the 95% of the visitors are satisfied with the helpfulness of librarary staffs.

To begin with, full-time undergraduate students are at top of the user catagory at 44%. Followed by, full-time postgraduate with 25%. where as the least visitors are academic stafffs with 7% only. Visting frequesy of peoples from part-time postgraduate and distance learner is in the range of 16,8% respectively

.

If we analyse the satisfaction of the people highest satisfaction variable is helpfulness of staff and lowest is aviailiability of journals. regarding the availability of books 40% students are fairly satisfied which is the higher percentage and lower is helpfulness of staff by 5%. While 20% members from availability of journals is totally dissatisfied, also by reliability of wifi and availabity of books 19% and 10% individuals are not satisfied.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response covers all parts of the visual data by summarising both the pie chart categories and the table satisfaction percentages. An overview is successfully presented in the second paragraph, noting the dominance of full-time undergraduates and high satisfaction with staff helpfulness. Key features and comparisons are selected and reported, such as 44% for full-time undergraduates and 7% for academic staff, alongside satisfaction ratings like 95% for staff helpfulness. However, there are minor data inaccuracies in the reporting of specific figures, such as stating '16,8% respectively' for part-time postgraduates and distance learners, and some confusion in interpreting the satisfaction breakdown percentages. Nonetheless, the core information is adequately communicated, fulfilling the task requirements for a Band 6.0.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear attempt to structure the information logically into an introduction, overview, and body paragraphs. Paragraphing is used to separate the chart data from the table data. However, cohesion is sometimes faulty or mechanical. The use of transitional phrases like 'To begin with' and 'If we analyse' feels somewhat unnatural for an Academic Task 1 response. Furthermore, referencing and sentence linking are occasionally awkward, such as 'where as the least visitors' starting a new sentence fragment after a comma. Paragraphing overall is sufficient, but logical flow is hindered by mechanical transitions and minor organizational slips, placing this securely at Band 6.0.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common lexical items such as 'dominent', 'satisfaction variable', and 'dissatisfied'. However, there are numerous noticeable spelling and word-choice errors throughout the text, including 'librarary staffs', 'catagory', 'Visting frequesy', 'aviailiability', and 'availabity'. These errors indicate limited precision and control over spelling and word formation. While communication is not severely impeded, the high frequency of lexical slips and incorrect collocations prevents the response from achieving a higher band, aligning best with Band 5.0 descriptors.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some variety in structure. However, grammatical accuracy is weak, with frequent errors that occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. Examples include missing articles ('from full-time undergraduate level'), punctuation and sentence boundary errors (e.g., hanging fragments like 'and distance learner is in the range of 16,8% respectively .'), and awkward prepositions or relative clauses ('where as the least visitors are academic stafffs with 7% only'). The majority of sentences contain minor or major structural errors, meaning control is inconsistent. This performance corresponds to a Band 5.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.