Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart given here depicts the various proportions of library users at a university whereas the table diplays data about library user satisfaction survey covering various factors affecting the students and staff members of the university.

Overall, it can be seen that full-time undergraduates constitutes a major propotion of library users with the academic staff being the least. By and large, a great amount of users are satisfied from the services provided by the university library.

44% of the library users are full-time undergraduates, followed by 25% of full-time postgraduate which on comparing to the part-time postgraduate is 9% more, i.e., 16%. The academic staff and the distance learning students are at 7% and 8% respectively. Taking in account the survey results, 65% of users are satisfied and 35% are fairly satisfied by the library timings. Whereas, 95% are satisfied by the helpfullness provided by the staff with 5% fairly satisfied. There is no unsatisfied users for this category. 50% readers are very satisfied about the availablity of books and 40% are fairly satisfied, leaving 10% unsatisfied. The Availablity of journals also provide a similar data, 45% and 35% satisfied and fairly satisfied with 20% unsatisfied, The reliability of wi-fi also has nearly the same amount with minor alterations.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The student successfully addresses all parts of the prompt by summarising both the pie chart and the table. An overview is provided, highlighting the main trends such as full-time undergraduates forming the largest proportion of library users and the generally high levels of satisfaction. Key features are reported and compared appropriately, such as noting that full-time postgraduates are 9% higher than part-time postgraduates. However, the conclusion of the response trails off slightly into a sweeping summary ("The reliability of wi-fi also has nearly the same amount with minor alterations") rather than fully integrating the remaining data points. Despite this minor shortcoming in extending the final comparison, the response meets the core requirements of Task Achievement at a Band 6.5 to 7.0 level, comfortably earning a 6.5.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response is structured with a clear introduction, an overall summary paragraph, and body paragraphs detailing the specific data. Cohesive devices are used to connect ideas, such as "whereas", "followed by", and "Taking in account". Paragraphing is managed logically, with a distinct separation between the pie chart breakdown and the survey satisfaction percentages. However, referencing and transitions become a bit mechanical in the final sentences ("The Availablity of journals also provide a similar data... the reliability of wi-fi also has nearly the same amount"), resulting in a slightly repetitive list-like flow. Nevertheless, overall progression is clear, supporting a Band 6.5 score.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary suitable for the task, incorporating terms like "proportion", "depicts", "satisfaction", and "minor alterations". There are some lexical inaccuracies and spelling slips, such as "diplays" instead of "displays", "helpfullness" instead of "helpfulness", and "availablity" instead of "availability". Furthermore, collocation is occasionally awkward, as seen in "satisfied from the services" instead of "satisfied with the services". Despite these errors, the vocabulary is sufficient to communicate the main data points clearly, aligning with the descriptors for Band 6.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The writer demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, including subordinate clauses and comparative structures (e.g., "which on comparing to the part-time postgraduate is 9% more"). There are several grammatical errors and punctuation issues throughout the text, such as subject-verb agreement ("full-time undergraduates constitutes" instead of "constitute"), a run-comma splice in the final sentence, and minor preposition slips. However, these errors do not impede overall communication. The presence of complex sentence attempts alongside frequent minor errors places this response firmly at Band 6.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.