Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-29

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The table and chart illustrate the results of a survey of library users at a university. Several categories of library users are discussed in the chart and the satisfaction of library users are explained in the table.

It is clear that majority of full-time undergraduate students show keen interest in the library followed by full-time postgraduate students as compared to other part time students and staff.

Five types of categories were discussed and 44 % were full-time graduate students. 25% of library users were full-time postgraduate students, whereas 16% were part-time postgraduate students. 85 of users consist of those people who are involved in distance learning and only 7% academic staff were interested in library.

Level of satisfaction of library users depends on various factors such as opening hours, availaibility of materials, and helpfulness of staff. 65% people were very satisfied with the opening hours of library and 35% were fairly satisfied. Almost all the people were very satisfied with the helpfulness of staff, whereas only 5% were fairly satisfied and there was not a single people who was not satisfied with the staff. 50% of people were really satisfied with the books availability and 35 % were fairly satisfied and 20% people were not satisfied at all. Majority of people completely satisfied with the availability of journals, while 35% were fairly satisfied and 20% were not satisfied. 485 users believed that wifi connection was really strong, whereas 33% were not fully satisfied and 20% people were completely unsatisfied with the wifi connection.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The student covers all parts of the task by reporting the main features of both the chart and the table. An overview is present, and key data points such as the 44% for full-time undergraduates and the high satisfaction with the helpfulness of staff (95%) are correctly identified. However, there are some minor data transcription or reading errors in the text, such as stating "85 of users" instead of 8% for distance learning, and minor misreadings in the journal and wi-fi percentages (e.g., writing "485 users" instead of 48%). Despite these minor numerical inaccuracies, the general trends and comparisons are adequately reported, placing this response at Band 6.0.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response is organized into clear paragraphs, starting with an introduction, moving to the chart data, and concluding with the table data. Cohesive devices such as 'whereas', 'followed by', and 'such as' are used to connect ideas. However, paragraphing could be structured more cleanly, and referencing is occasionally slightly repetitive ('50% of people... 35% were... and 20% people...'). Progression is generally logical, making the response easy to follow overall, aligning well with the Band 6.0 descriptors.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully using terms like 'illustrate', 'satisfaction', 'proportion', and 'category'. There are some awkward phrasings or word choices, such as 'keen interest in the library' when referring to user categories, and a few typographical or mechanical errors ('availaibility', 'not a single people'). Less common vocabulary is attempted with mixed success, but communication is never impeded. This fits the Band 6.0 profile.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The writer employs a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing relative clauses and comparative structures (e.g., 'whereas 16% were part-time postgraduate students'). There are noticeable grammatical and punctuation errors throughout, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('there was not a single people') and numerical typos ('485 users'). While these errors occur regularly, they do not impede overall communication. The command of grammar corresponds to a Band 6.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.