Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-02
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Categories of library users
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The pie chart and table gives the information of a survey's result based on categories of library users and their satisfaction at a university.
Overall, full-time undergraduate are the majority users visit library, while the full-time postgraduate are second. Academic staff are the least faculty to go the library. People's satisfaction based on helpfullness of staff is the most and also the library opening hours people are very satisfied. Users regarding availability of journals are the not satisfied at all, while availability of books users are fairly satisfied.
More than 75% categories of users are covered by full-time undergraduate and full-time postgraduate (respectively 44% and 25%), opposed to academic staff and distance learning that only covered 7% and 8%. And for those part-time postgraduate they the third most users 16%.
In terms of satisfaction, users are very satisfied about the helpfullness of staff and library opening hours (respectivey 95% and 65%), whereas, people who are not satisfied about availability of journals and reliability of wi-fi is 20% and 19%. Only 5% users are fairly satisfied with helfulness of staff.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
The response successfully addresses all parts of the prompt by summarising the main features of the chart and table and making appropriate comparisons. The overall trend is correctly identified, with full-time undergraduates and postgraduates highlighted as the dominant groups. Key data points, such as the highest satisfaction scores for staff helpfulness and library opening hours, are integrated well. However, some ideas are slightly under-developed or imprecise; for instance, the description of dissatisfaction regarding journals and Wi-Fi lacks a fully cohesive extension of how these metrics compare to the positive ratings. To reach the next level, the reporting of data needs to be more thoroughly extended with sharper analytical comparisons across both visual inputs.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response maintains a generally coherent overall arrangement with a logical progression of ideas, separating the pie chart overview from the table's satisfaction statistics into distinct paragraphs. Cohesive devices are employed, such as 'Overall', 'More than 75%', and 'In terms of satisfaction', which help guide the reader through the data. Nevertheless, referencing and cohesion occasionally feel mechanical or slightly awkward, as seen in abrupt transitions between sentences like 'Academic staff are the least faculty to go the library. People's satisfaction based on helpfullness...' Improving the fluidity of inter-sentence connections and ensuring smoother logical bridges between distinct graphical elements would elevate this aspect further.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, allowing the student to convey basic statistical information and user categories clearly. There are, however, noticeable word choice and spelling inaccuracies, such as 'helpfullness' instead of helpfulness, and awkward phrasing like 'majority users visit library' and 'are the not satisfied at all'. While these errors do not severely impede communication, they reflect a limited range and occasional lapses in word form and collocation. To achieve a higher band, the writer should incorporate a wider variety of precise, less common lexical items and ensure accurate spelling and word formation throughout.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
The student demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating relative clauses and introductory prepositional phrases. Grammatical control is moderate, but several errors persist, including subject-verb agreement issues ('full-time undergraduate are', '5% users are fairly satisfied'), missing articles ('gives the information of a survey's result'), and awkward prepositional use. Despite these lapses, communication is rarely impeded, and the majority of basic structures are handled adequately. To progress to a higher grammatical tier, the writer needs to eliminate recurrent agreement and article errors while demonstrating more consistent control over complex multi-clause structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.