Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The chart illustrates library users being survey at university while the table shows the satifaction of library users.

Overall, Full-time undergraduates acquire the large shares of lbrary users follow by full-time postgraduate and part-time postgraduate whereas in contrast, Academic staff have the lowest share in all among of them.In satisfaction of user, a large of users are not satified by the availability of journals and reliability of wi-fi.

Library users are mainly divided into five catagorie in which the highest shares are taken up by full-time graduate with 44 percent of the total. Postgraduate students are mainly divided into two catagories namely as Full-time and Part-time having 25 and 16 percent shares. While, the remote users or learning from home have 8 percent and Academic staff have a very low part consisting of 7 percent.

Meanwhile, if we see the satisfaction level, almost every user is satisfied by the library working hours, helpfulness of staff and availbility of books. The most dramatic rise is in the users who are not satisfied have primiarly due to the avaibility of journals by 20 percent and the reliability of wifi by 19 percent.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by reporting data from both the chart and the table. An overview is present, highlighting that full-time undergraduates form the largest group and academic staff the smallest, alongside noting dissatisfaction trends. However, some ideas and details are under-developed or inaccurately described. For instance, the claim that 'almost every user is satisfied by the library working hours, helpfulness of staff and availbility of books' misses the nuance that only 50% are very satisfied regarding books, with 40% fairly satisfied and 10% not satisfied. Similarly, stating 'the most dramatic rise is in the users who are not satisfied' misinterprets the static percentage data as a trend over time. To reach a higher level, the response needs to report the data with greater precision and avoid mischaracterising cross-sectional survey results as dynamic changes.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response maintains a coherent overall arrangement and attempts a logical progression by separating the pie chart data from the table data into distinct paragraphs. Paragraphing is used to group related information, starting with an introduction and overview, followed by user categories, and concluding with satisfaction levels. However, cohesion is sometimes faulty or mechanical. The use of transitional phrases like 'While, the remote users' and 'Meanwhile, if we see the satisfaction level' feels awkward and disrupts the natural flow of ideas. Furthermore, referencing is occasionally unclear, such as the dangling modifier 'while in contrast, Academic staff have the lowest share in all among of them.' Improving the flexibility and accuracy of cohesive devices would elevate the organisational quality of the writing.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, allowing the student to communicate basic data points such as percentages and categories. There are attempts to use less common vocabulary items, such as 'sub-categories', 'proportional shares', and 'dissatisfaction levels', but these are accompanied by noticeable word-choice errors, misspellings, and awkward collocations. Examples include 'satifaction' instead of satisfaction, 'catagorie' instead of categories, 'acquire the large shares' instead of account for the largest proportion, and 'availbility' instead of availability. While these errors do not severely impede communication, they restrict the lexical score. To achieve a higher band, the student must expand their range of vocabulary, improve spelling accuracy, and use precise collocations appropriate for academic reporting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating relative clauses and comparative structures such as 'users who are not satisfied'. There are, however, several grammatical and structural errors throughout the text. Issues include passive voice construction errors ('library users being survey'), preposition misuse ('survey at university' instead of survey of university library users, 'share in all among of them'), and subject-verb agreement slips ('a large of users are not satified'). Punctuation and sentence boundary errors also occur, such as run-on sentences and missing spaces after periods. Although these errors rarely impede communication and the basic meaning remains clear, the frequency of structural flaws prevents the writing from attaining a higher band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.