Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The chart and table below depicts the outcomes of a research conducted at a university for library users.

Overall, it is evident that full-time undergraduates accounted for the highest percentage for using library whereas academic staff and distance learning categories represented the lowest proportion of users. Notably, library users are extremely satisfied with the helpfulness of staff as compared to other categories.

on the one hand, full-time undergraduates was a dominant category in using library with 44% proportion. following this, full-time postgraduates share 25% figures and took second rank. Moreover, remaining categories namely, part-time postgraduates, distance learning and academic staff shares 16%, 8% and 7% statistics.

On the other hand, individuals are highly satisfied with the helpfulness of library staff with zero unsatisfied vote. Library opening hours category accounted for 65% satisfaction rate with 35% fairly satisfied and zero for unsatisfied. Subsequently, remaining sections including availability of books and journals and reliability of wi-fi share the somehow similar records with minor difference in all the satisfaction levels.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response successfully covers all parts of the prompt by presenting an overview of both the pie chart and the satisfaction table, while also selecting and reporting key features and comparisons. The main trends are appropriately identified, such as full-time undergraduates representing the largest group of library users at 44% and staff helpfulness receiving the highest satisfaction ratings with 95% very satisfied. However, some areas are slightly under-developed or lack complete precision; for instance, the description of the remaining satisfaction categories grouped together as sharing 'somehow similar records with minor difference' misses the opportunity to clearly highlight specific distinctions like the 20% 'not satisfied' figure for the availability of journals. To reach a higher level, the response would benefit from fully extending all descriptions with more precise comparative commentary across all data points.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement and logical progression, divided appropriately into an introduction, an overview, and body paragraphs dedicated to the two separate datasets. Cohesive devices are employed to guide the reader through the data, such as 'Notably', 'on the one hand', and 'On the other hand'. However, referencing and cohesion occasionally feel somewhat mechanical or faulty, as seen in minor awkward transitions and repetitive sentence openings. Furthermore, paragraphing could be improved by ensuring every category is integrated more smoothly. To progress further, the writer should use a wider variety of cohesive relationships naturally and ensure seamless paragraph transitions without relying on formulaic transition markers.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

An adequate range of vocabulary is deployed to complete the task effectively, with successful attempts at less common and topic-specific vocabulary such as 'proportion', 'satisfaction rate', and 'categories'. Nonetheless, there are noticeable lexical inaccuracies and awkward word choices, such as 'zero unsatisfied vote' instead of 'no negative ratings', 'shares 25% figures', and the informal phrase 'somehow similar records'. Spelling and word formation are generally accurate, and errors do not impede communication. To achieve a higher band, the writer needs to demonstrate greater precision in word choice and collocation, minimizing awkward phrasing and utilising a more sophisticated lexicon for reporting statistical data.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The response demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, incorporating relative clauses and comparative forms. There is good control over basic sentence patterns, but some grammatical errors and punctuation issues persist throughout the text. Examples include subject-verb agreement errors such as 'full-time undergraduates was a dominant category', lowercase starting letters for sentences ('on the one hand' and 'following this'), and missing articles or incorrect prepositions in phrases like 'in using library' instead of 'using the library'. These errors rarely impede communication, reflecting typical control at this level. To attain a higher band score, the writer must produce a greater proportion of error-free complex sentences and exercise tighter control over punctuation, capitalization, and articles.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.