Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart displays percentage of people who uses library at a university, while the table outlines the proportion of satisfied users.

Overall, it is clear that full-time undergraduate students allocated the highest proportion whereas academic staff posted a lowest percentage of the users. By contrast, more people are satisfied with the staff and least satsified with the availability of journals.

The proportion of full-time regular students showed a percentage of 44%, meanwhile full-time postgraduate posted a quarter of the total. Part-time postgraduate users occupied 16% whereas distance learning students from all courses and academic staff accounts for 7% and 8% respectively.

Analyzing the proportion of satisfaction, library opening hours posted 65% with very satisfied whereas 35% as fairly satisfied and no user who's not satisfied. Helpfullness of staff sums up with 95% much satisfaction and 5% fairly satisfaction with no unsatisfied user. Half of the users were quite satisfied with the books available while less satisfied and not satisfied posted 40% and 10% respectively. Journals available showed 45% very satisfied, 35% fairly satisfied and 20% with those who are not satsified making it the highest proprtion of unsatisfaction. There was a 48% more satisfaction with wifi reliability and 33% fairly satisfaction, meanwhile recorded a 19% of unsatisfaction.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover both visuals and give a clear overview: undergraduates form the largest user group, academic staff the smallest, and staff helpfulness receives the strongest satisfaction ratings while journals attract the most dissatisfaction. Most figures are reported accurately, including the 44%, 25%, 16%, 8% and 7% user shares and the satisfaction breakdowns. This meets the task well, with some features more fully reported than others. One important accuracy issue is that the overview says academic staff have the lowest percentage, but the figures show distance learners at 8% and academic staff at 7%, so academic staff are indeed lowest; however, the user-group figures later reverse these two values. Also, “full-time regular students” is not a chart category. To strengthen the response further, keep labels precise and make the comparisons in the overview more explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall structure: an introduction and overview are followed by a paragraph on user categories and one on satisfaction. This makes the two visuals easy to distinguish, and linking expressions such as “Overall,” “By contrast,” and “Analyzing” help signal progression. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. “Meanwhile” is used to join figures that are better presented as separate comparisons, and the long satisfaction paragraph becomes a sequence of item-by-item statements rather than a clearly grouped comparison. The phrase “There was a 48% more satisfaction” also makes the relationship between the wi-fi figures difficult to follow. Grouping the strongest ratings together, then comparing the weaker areas, would improve progression and cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “allocated,” “availability,” and “reliability,” and the reader can generally understand the comparisons. However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for describing survey data. “Full-time regular students” does not match the chart label, while “posted,” “occupied,” and “sums up with” are awkward collocations in this context. There are also spelling errors in “Helpfullness,” “satsified,” and “proprtion,” and repeated use of “satisfaction” makes the account less precise. These issues limit the flexibility and accuracy of the vocabulary. Prefer standard reporting verbs such as “accounted for” or “represented,” and use “very satisfied” consistently when describing the table’s categories.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “whereas” and “while,” and the main comparisons are usually understandable. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly with agreement, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “people who uses library” should be “people who use the library,” and “academic staff accounts” should be “academic staff account.” The construction “no user who's not satisfied” is awkward and would be clearer as “no users were dissatisfied.” In “Journals available showed…,” the noun phrase needs a clearer grammatical form, such as “For the availability of journals…”. Aim to check subject–verb agreement and make each comparison a complete, parallel sentence; this would improve accuracy while retaining your attempts at complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.