Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The pie chart illustrates the proportion of five different types of library users whereas the table provides us with the percentages of people's satisfaction with the library.

Overall, full-time undergraduate students accounted for the largest share among the other users of the library, whereas academic staff represented the smallest. Majority of the users are very satisfied with the helpfulness of the staff while the unavailability of journals left them the most unsatified.

According to the pie chart, the full-time undergrate students contributed to the highest proportaion of the users and stood at 44%, followed by full-time postgraduates that shared a quater of whole pie chart. Howerver, the number of users decreased substantially as 16% of part-time postgraduates used the library and distance learning users had half of the share. The least number of percentage was of the Academic staff that was 1% less than the distance learning users.

Moving onto the table, 95% of the users were very satified with the staff. In terms of the availability of books and journals, many had mixed reviews as almost half of the people were very satisfiers while the rest were fairly and unsatisfied.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main user-group contrast accurately: full-time undergraduates are the largest group at 44%, and academic staff the smallest at 7%. You also note that staff helpfulness receives the strongest satisfaction rating and journals the highest dissatisfaction. However, some details are inaccurate or unclear: distance learners account for 8%, not “half of the share” of part-time postgraduates, and academic staff are one percentage point below distance learners, not the other way around. The table discussion is underdeveloped: it omits the opening-hours results and the wi-fi figures, and the claim that books and journals had similar mixed reviews obscures their different satisfaction patterns. More precise comparisons across all categories would make the summary more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response is organised into a clear introduction, overview and two body paragraphs, and the progression from user categories to satisfaction data is easy to follow. Linking phrases such as “Overall,” “According to the pie chart” and “Moving onto the table” help signal each stage. This clear structure supports a logical account, although some connections are less effective: “However” does not clearly introduce the figures that follow, and “the rest” in the final paragraph is vague about which satisfaction groups it refers to. The final table paragraph also ends without a concluding comparison or a clear account of the remaining categories. Use more precise referencing and connect each comparison directly to the relevant figures.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a suitable range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “accounted for,” “share,” “helpfulness” and “availability,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more varied phrasing, such as “decreased substantially.” However, several spelling errors—“undergrate,” “proportaion,” “Howerver” and “satified”—reduce accuracy. Some expressions are imprecise or unnatural: “half of the share” misrepresents the data, “the least number of percentage” is awkward, and “very satisfiers” is not an appropriate description of respondents. Choose standard chart language and check spelling carefully; precise vocabulary is especially important when reporting numerical comparisons.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including the opening contrast with “whereas” and the overview sentence comparing the largest and smallest groups. Most sentences remain understandable, and errors rarely obstruct the message. Some grammatical control is still inconsistent. For example, “Majority of the users are very satisfied” needs an article and a tense choice consistent with describing survey results; “the full-time undergraduate students contributed to the highest proportion” has an awkward grammatical construction; and “the least number of percentage was of the Academic staff” is difficult to structure naturally. The final sentence also uses “many had mixed reviews” without a clear grammatical reference. Practise accurate noun phrases and sentence patterns for describing proportions and survey responses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.