Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart and table illustrate the outcomes of a survey of library users at university.

Overall, In pie chart, 'full time undergraduate users' accounted the largest proportion. While 'academic staff' represented the smallest share. On the other hand, 'very satisfied users' on the table have dominancy whereas 'not satisfied users' are minors.

The pie chart illustrates the survey on 100 library users respectively. The user sample has been taken from different categories. These are academic staff, full time undergraduates, full time postgraduates, part time post graduates and the students from distance learning program. Among these, full time undergraduates stood dominant with 44%. Whereas, table shows academic staff with smallest share of percentage, which is 7%. Other entities; come with 8%, 16%, and 25% respectively.

On the other hand, table depicts the category of sample which included very, fairly and not satisfied. Survey was conducted about opening hours, helpfulness of staff, availability of books, availability of journals and reliability of wifi of library. Very satisfied users ranked first in all categories. By comparison, fairly satisfied users stood second and not satisfied users accounted for smallest share.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main user group accurately: full-time undergraduates make up the largest share at 44%, while academic staff are the smallest at 7%. You also recognise that very satisfied responses generally lead the table. This covers both visuals and gives a relevant overview. However, the overview is not fully precise: “not satisfied users are minors” is unclear, and the table shows that dissatisfaction is zero for opening hours and staff helpfulness, but reaches 20% for journals. The body lists the satisfaction categories without reporting most of their figures or comparing the less positive results. To strengthen the response, select key contrasts—for example, 95% satisfaction with staff helpfulness versus 45% with journals—and describe the variation rather than implying the same pattern applies equally to every service.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the chart and table. This makes the two visuals easy to distinguish, and phrases such as “Overall” and “On the other hand” signal relationships between ideas. However, some links are mechanical or confusing. “On the other hand” does not clearly express the relationship between the user categories and satisfaction results, while “Whereas, table shows academic staff” incorrectly shifts the chart’s smallest category into the table discussion. The final paragraph lists the services but does not develop a clear sequence of comparisons. Use paragraphing to group the chart’s proportions and the table’s strongest and weakest results, and connect each comparison explicitly to the relevant service.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “accounted,” “proportion,” “represented,” “availability,” and “reliability.” These terms help communicate the subject and show an attempt to use more formal language. Some less natural choices, however, reduce precision: “have dominancy,” “are minors,” “stood dominant,” and “entities” do not fit the intended meanings in this context. There is also inconsistency in forms such as “full time” and “post graduates.” Aim for standard chart-description collocations and precise labels, such as “accounted for the largest share,” “the smallest proportion,” and “respondents.” This would make the report sound more natural while retaining the range you already demonstrate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex forms, including contrast clauses with “while” and “whereas,” and most of the message remains understandable. Some grammatical errors are noticeable, though. For example, “accounted the largest proportion” needs the preposition “for,” and “In pie chart” needs an article and a more complete construction. The sentence beginning “Whereas, table shows…” is a fragment, and “The pie chart illustrates the survey on 100 library users respectively” has an unclear structure. Capitalisation after “Overall” is also inconsistent. Practise complete sentences with accurate articles and prepositions, and check that each contrast clause is attached to a main clause. These changes would improve control without requiring more complicated sentence patterns.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.