Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-10

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given pie chart illustrates the consequences of a investigation of library users at a university,While the given table depictes comaprison of satisfaction users of library.

It is apparent that, full time undergratuate accounted for the largest proportion of library users,Whereas academic staff experienced a least amount of library users. Regarding to the library satisfication, helpfulness of staff represented rose ratio of the very satisified.However,Reliability of wifi was the lowest ratings in very satisfied categories.

Firstly,Full time undergraduated displayed the highest percentage to 44%, Which is 19% more than full time postgraduate.Subsequently,part time postgraduate was only 16% users of library.Followed by distance learning experienced 8%. in comparison , academic staff at 7%.

Secondly,helpfulness of staff rating was consequently ahead to 95%,remaning fairly satisfied was only 5%.Followed by , libeary opening hours were rated very satisfied by 65%,While 35% in fairly satisfied. Availability of books and reliability of wifi received rating of 50% and 48% relatively.As compared in fairly satisfied rating was 40 % and 33%.Moreover, only 20% highest not satisfied rating in availability of journals .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main user group and the smallest group, and your overview also highlights the strongest satisfaction result: staff helpfulness at 95% very satisfied. These are relevant key features, and most figures you report match the data. You also compare user categories and several satisfaction measures. However, the overview is not fully balanced: it calls wi-fi the lowest very-satisfied rating, although journals are lower at 45% compared with wi-fi at 48%. The final comparison also says journals had the highest dissatisfaction, which is correct, but does not give the 20% figure clearly. To strengthen the response, make the overview more precise and cover the main contrasts across both visuals, including the relatively high satisfaction with opening hours and the weaker ratings for journals and wi-fi.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for user categories and satisfaction results. Sequencing words such as “Firstly” and “Secondly” help signal the shift between the two visuals. However, progression within the satisfaction paragraph becomes difficult to follow because several figures are listed in quick succession, and links such as “Followed by” and “Moreover” do not always show the exact relationship between the data. Some punctuation also runs sentences together, for example after “university” and “satisfied.” Group the satisfaction results into clearer comparisons—strongest ratings, then weaker ratings—and use linking phrases that accurately express contrast or comparison.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “largest proportion,” “accounted for,” “percentage,” and “rating,” which helps communicate the main data. However, the range and control are limited by repeated or imprecise expressions such as “library users,” “rating,” and “Followed by.” Several word choices and collocations are unnatural, including “consequences of a investigation,” “rose ratio,” and “experienced 8%.” Spelling errors such as “depictes,” “comaprison,” and “satisified” are noticeable and sometimes slow the reader. Aim for accurate, conventional chart language—for example, “survey,” “share,” “recorded,” and “was rated”—and check spelling carefully. This would make the description more precise and easier to read.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and more complex comparisons, using structures such as “Whereas…” and “Which is 19% more than…”. However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence construction, articles, agreement, and punctuation sometimes make the relationships between ideas unclear. For example, “the given table depictes comaprison” has an incorrect verb form and lacks an article before “comparison,” while “full time undergraduated displayed” uses an unsuitable grammatical form. Several clauses are joined with commas or begin with a capitalised “Which” without a complete sentence. Practise building complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, and use commas and full stops to separate comparisons. More accurate control of these patterns would improve clarity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.