Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given pie chart and table illustrates the survey result of library users at a university.

According to the pie chart that full time undergraduate student spend a huge time in library which has 44%ratio. full time postgraduate student stand at second position approximately 25%. While, 16% Part time postgraduate students use the library for study. on the other hand distance learning and Academic staff users of library almost 8% and 7%.

It is apparently seen that 65% individual very satisfied of library opening hours. 35% fairly satisfied and no one who cna not satisfied of opening hours. however, 95% users very satisfied of staff and they say staff are very helpfulness. only 5% individual fairly satisfied of the library staff. while due to lack of books that 50% users very satisfied the avalability of books. 40% fairly satisfied. 10%people not satisfied of avalability of books. besides, that avalability of journals 45% users very satisfied. 35% fairly satisfied a large number of users 20percent not satisfied of journals. on the other hand that 48%users very satisfied the reliability of wifi. 33% fairly satisfied and 19% users not satisfied of the wifi service.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You cover both visuals and report many figures accurately, including the largest user group (full-time undergraduates, 44%), the 25% postgraduate figure, and satisfaction results for all five services. However, the response mainly lists data rather than selecting and comparing the key features, and it lacks a clear overall summary. For example, it does not highlight that staff helpfulness received the strongest satisfaction rating (95% very satisfied), while journals had the highest dissatisfaction (20%). The phrase “due to lack of books” also suggests a cause that the table does not provide. To strengthen the report, add a concise overview of the main contrasts and describe the figures neutrally without inferring reasons.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a generally understandable sequence: it first describes the user categories and then moves through the satisfaction table. This gives the reader a basic overall arrangement. However, the second paragraph becomes a long series of figures, and transitions such as “however,” “while,” and “on the other hand” are sometimes used mechanically or do not clearly signal the relationship between points. The opening also does not establish a clear overview before the details. Use separate, focused paragraphs for the chart and table, and group related results—for instance, compare the high satisfaction with staff and opening hours against the lower ratings for journals and wi-fi. Clearer sentence boundaries and referencing would make the progression easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “very satisfied,” “fairly satisfied,” “availability,” and “reliability,” so the main subject is usually clear. However, the range is limited and several word choices or forms are inaccurate, sometimes making the meaning awkward: “spend a huge time in library,” “staff are very helpfulness,” and “avalability” are examples. Repetition of “users,” “satisfied,” and “library” also makes the account less precise. Choose neutral reporting language such as “accounted for,” “rated,” and “dissatisfied,” and use accurate collocations—for example, “the availability of books” and “the helpfulness of staff.” Proofreading spelling and word forms would improve clarity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response communicates the main figures, but grammatical control is uneven, and many sentences contain errors in agreement, articles, verb forms, or sentence construction. Examples include “The given pie chart and table illustrates,” “full time undergraduate student spend,” and “65% individual very satisfied,” where the subject and verb or the sentence structure are incomplete or mismatched. Some longer sequences joined with “while” or “however” are also difficult to punctuate and follow. Most statements rely on simple patterns, with limited accurate use of more varied structures. Practise complete reporting sentences such as “Full-time undergraduates accounted for 44% of users” and “No respondents were dissatisfied with the opening hours,” then check agreement, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.