Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The pie chart give proportion among five categories of library users while the given table shows the data of user satisfaction in library

Overall, full-time undergraduates made up the largest share of library users, while academic stuff made up the smallest. Users were mostly satisfied with the library. Satisfaction was the highest for the helpfulness of staff and lowest for availability of journals

Full-time undergraduates were the most common users of library, at 44%. Full-time postgraduates and part time came next,with share of 25% and 16%, while other courses and academic staff had only 8% and 7%

Moreover, 95% were very satisfied with helpful nature of staff, while 65% were very satisfied with opening hours of library. Lowest satisfaction was recorded for availability of journals. Only 50% users were satisfied with availability if book. Regarding the reliability of wifi, 48% were only very satisfied.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main user group and the smallest group accurately, and your overview also notes that satisfaction is generally positive, with staff helpfulness rated highest. However, some details are incomplete or imprecise: “full-time postgraduates and part time” does not clearly name part-time postgraduates, and “other courses” misrepresents distance-learning users. The satisfaction figures are also selectively reported: for example, the table shows 50% very satisfied with books, but your phrase “50% users were satisfied” blurs the distinction between very and fairly satisfied. The response is six words below the required minimum, and several comparisons—especially the fairly and not satisfied figures—are underdeveloped. Include a fuller, accurate account of the table’s key contrasts.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on user categories and a final paragraph on satisfaction. This makes the main information easy to locate, and transitions such as “Overall” and “Moreover” help signal the stages of the report. Some links are mechanical, however, and the final paragraph moves through satisfaction figures without a fully consistent comparison pattern. The phrase “Only 50% users…” follows the journal comparison but does not clearly distinguish the book rating from the other satisfaction categories. Develop a more systematic sequence—for example, compare the highest and lowest ratings first, then group the remaining results—and use precise references so each figure’s category is unmistakable.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “proportion,” “share,” “satisfaction,” and “availability,” and terms such as “largest” and “smallest” help describe the user distribution. The range is nevertheless limited, with repeated reliance on “satisfied” and “share,” and some word choices are inaccurate or awkward. “Academic stuff” is too informal and changes the meaning of academic staff; “other courses” is not an accurate label for distance-learning users; and “helpful nature of staff” is less natural than a concise description of staff helpfulness. There are also spelling and form slips, including “wifi” and “part time.” Use the chart’s exact category labels and vary reporting language with expressions such as “accounted for” and “rated very satisfied.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You communicate the main comparisons using a mixture of simple statements and some more developed structures, such as “while academic stuff made up the smallest.” Most sentences remain understandable, but errors in agreement, articles, punctuation and sentence construction are noticeable. For example, “The pie chart give” needs subject–verb agreement, and “at 44%” is clearer than “at 44%” only when attached to a complete, well-formed comparison. Missing spaces after commas in “came next,with” and “25% and 16%” also affect presentation. In “Only 50% users were satisfied,” an article is needed before “users.” Practise checking each sentence for a clear subject and verb, and use accurate comparative structures to improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.