Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The pie chart illustrate the results of a survey that how many students used library at a university, whereas table shows the percentage of students's satisfaction level.

Overall, it is evident that full-time undergraduate students recorded the largest proportion, whereas academic staff had the smallest. On the other hand, table depicts that the helpfulness of staff had the highest percentage while availability of journals showed the lowest.

Looking at the details, full-time undergraduate students accounted for 44%, making it the most dominant category. This is followed by full-time postgraduate at 25%, part-time postgraduate 16%. Moreover, distance learning (all cources) represented 8% and the least popular category was academic staff, which constituted just 7%.

Turning to table, 95% students were very satisfied with helpfulness of staff and 5% was fairly satisfied, making it the leading category. In addition, library opening hours satisfied 65% people and 35% remained fairly satisfied. Followed by, 50% were very satisfied and 40% was fairly satified whereas 10% was not satisfied. Furthermore, 45% individuals were very satisfied from availability of journals whereas 35% fairly satisfied and 20% not satisfied, ranking it fourth category. Finally, 48% remained satisfied with reliability of wi-fi, 33% fairly satisfied and 19% not satisfied.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover both visuals and provide a clear overview: undergraduates form the largest user group, academic staff the smallest, and staff helpfulness receives the strongest satisfaction ratings. Most figures are reported accurately, including the user-category proportions and the satisfaction breakdowns for opening hours, books, journals and Wi-Fi. However, the overview’s claim that journals had the lowest satisfaction is not fully precise: journals have the lowest “very satisfied” figure, but Wi-Fi has a slightly lower combined share of very and fairly satisfied users. The books row is also left without its subject, so readers must infer what the 50%, 40% and 10% refer to. More precise comparisons across satisfaction categories would complete an otherwise relevant summary.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response is organised effectively into an introduction, an overview and two detail sections, moving from user categories to satisfaction results. Sequencing phrases such as “Looking at the details” and “Turning to table” help signal these shifts, and the figures are generally presented in a logical order. The final section, however, becomes a list of separate results, and “Followed by” is attached awkwardly to the preceding sentence rather than forming a clear transition. The books figures also lack an explicit label, weakening the connection between the data and its subject. To strengthen progression, group related satisfaction results and use clearer links that show how the categories compare, rather than relying mainly on additive transitions such as “In addition” and “Furthermore”.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “accounted for,” “constituted,” “proportion,” and “satisfaction level,” which helps describe the data. Some less common choices are not fully natural or precise: “most dominant category” is redundant, “ranking it fourth category” is awkward, and “satisfied from availability of journals” uses an unsuitable collocation. There are also spelling errors in “cources” and “satified,” and “students’s” is incorrectly formed. Repeated use of “percentage,” “satisfied” and “category” makes parts of the report less flexible. Aim for accurate chart language such as “share,” “rated,” and “the lowest proportion,” and check spelling and collocations carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including contrast clauses with “whereas” and participial phrasing such as “making it the most dominant category.” Meaning is generally clear, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “The pie chart illustrate” has subject–verb disagreement, while “a survey that how many students used library” is not a well-formed clause. In “part-time postgraduate 16%,” the relationship between the category and figure needs a verb or clearer punctuation. The sentence beginning “Followed by, 50%...” is a fragment, and “5% was fairly satisfied” has an agreement problem because the subject is plural in meaning. Review articles and sentence boundaries, and build complex sentences around complete clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.