Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The piechart gives the proportion of various category of users on the other hand table provides the data on the level of satisfaction which was carried out after a survey of university library.

Overall, the library was mostly occupied by full-time undegraduates and rarely by the academic staff.Moreover,large percentage of readers are highly satisfied with each services provided at the library.

In the library, readers like full-time undergraduates shares a considerable propotion with 44%, which nearly stands for the half of the portion.Full-time postgraduate users covers almost the quater with 25%. Next in line is part-time postgraduates with 16%of the share.At the very bottom,users such as distance learning and academic staff stands nearly at equal contribution with 8%and 7% respectively.

Furthermore, the service provided by the staff members was significantly satisfied by the users with 95%.Wifi services was seen to have varaiables in the satisfaction level with nearly half very satisfied and 33 % fairly satisfied.People were largely unsatisfied with availabilty of journals with almost 20% not satisfied. Lastly availabilty of books and opening hours was greatly satisfied with 50% and 65% and fairly satisfied with 40% and 35% respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response covers both visuals and gives a clear overview: full-time undergraduates form the largest user group, academic staff the smallest, and satisfaction is generally high. The main figures for user categories are accurately reported, and the comparisons for books and opening hours are also correct. You select useful satisfaction details, including the 95% very satisfied with staff helpfulness and the 20% not satisfied with journals. To make the account more complete and precise, report the remaining key contrasts: opening hours and staff helpfulness have no dissatisfied users, while wi-fi has 19% not satisfied. Also avoid saying readers are highly satisfied with “each services,” since journal satisfaction is more mixed. Overall, the main features are selected and supported, though the overview slightly overgeneralises.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on user categories and a final paragraph on satisfaction. This gives the reader a logical route through the two visuals, and transitions such as “Overall,” “Next in line” and “Furthermore” help signal progression. The half-band strength is that the information is generally grouped appropriately and comparisons are easy to follow. However, some linking is mechanical or imprecise: “on the other hand” suggests a contrast between the chart and table, when they present complementary information, and “Lastly” does not clearly mark the final comparison. Improve cohesion by using more direct links between related figures and by keeping each comparison within a clearly signposted sequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some suitable task vocabulary, including “proportion,” “satisfaction level,” “share” and “not satisfied,” and the meaning is generally understandable. There is also an attempt to vary wording rather than repeat “percentage” throughout. However, the range is limited by inaccurate word choice and collocation, such as “library was mostly occupied,” “readers like full-time undergraduates,” and “service … was significantly satisfied.” Several spelling errors, including “undegraduates,” “propotion,” “quater,” “varaiables” and “availabilty,” are noticeable and reduce precision. Choose standard chart-reporting expressions such as “accounted for,” “users” and “were very satisfied with,” and check spelling carefully. More accurate, natural phrasing would make the comparisons clearer.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response attempts a mix of simple and more complex sentences, including “which nearly stands for the half of the portion” and the longer comparison of books and opening hours. However, control is uneven, and errors recur in agreement, articles, plurals and sentence boundaries. For example, “various category of users” needs a plural noun, “academic staff … stands” has subject–verb disagreement, and “each services” combines a singular determiner with a plural noun. Missing spaces after punctuation and inconsistent comma use also affect readability. These errors do not usually prevent the reader from understanding the data, but they make several sentences awkward. Focus on accurate basic patterns first, then use complex clauses only when their grammar is secure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.