Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The pie chart and table illustrates results of survey of library users at the university.

Overall,pie chart categories different library users majority being university students completing undergradute and postgraduate courses.Smaller half of academic staff and distance learning stududents,Majority being satisfied with facilites provided by library..

Generally around 44% of library users are full-time undergradute learners,Full time postgradutes students also make up to 25% while part-time undergradutes being only 16%,As well there are academic staff using library for knowledge also contributing only 7% in survey.Distance learners studing all courses made up of only 8% in the survey..

The satisfactory chart showed very positive results for opening hours major participants 65% were very satisfied with opening hours and other 35% was fairly satisfied,Regarding behaviour and helpfulness of staff every user was very satsified.Availability of booking only pleased 50% of users other 40% was fairly satisfied but 10% were not happy,Availability of journals contented 45% other 35% also had no objection but 20% were unpleased,Reliability of wifi psatisfied around 80% individuals while 19% being unsatsfied..

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both visuals and identify several important features: full-time undergraduates are the largest user group at 44%, academic staff are the smallest at 7%, and satisfaction with staff and opening hours is high. You also report most satisfaction figures accurately. However, the overview is unclear and does not clearly summarise the main contrasts across the table. Some details are imprecise: “every user was very satisfied” with staff overlooks the 5% who were fairly satisfied, and “around 80%” satisfied with Wi-Fi combines the two positive categories without stating their separate figures. The user-group description also mistakenly calls the 16% part-time postgraduates “undergraduates.” A clearer overview and more precise reporting would make coverage more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on user categories, and a paragraph on satisfaction. This gives the reader a workable route through both visuals. However, progression is weakened by the overview’s fragment-like wording and by several ideas being crowded into long, comma-linked sentences, especially in the final paragraph. Connectors such as “Generally,” “As well,” and “Regarding” help signal shifts, but some links are mechanical or do not clarify the relationship between points. Grouping the satisfaction results into clear comparisons—for example, high satisfaction with opening hours and staff versus more mixed views of books, journals, and Wi-Fi—and using complete, well-punctuated sentences would improve cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “full-time,” “part-time,” “very satisfied,” and “reliability,” so the main subject is generally understandable. There is also some attempt to vary wording with “pleased,” “contented,” and “unpleased.” However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for describing survey results: “availability of booking” should refer to books, “behaviour and helpfulness” changes the table’s category, and “had no objection” is not a precise equivalent of being fairly satisfied. Spelling errors such as “undergradute,” “stududents,” “satsified,” and “wifi psatisfied” are noticeable and sometimes make reading difficult. Aim for accurate, consistent terms from the chart and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, and the reader can usually identify the intended comparisons. However, sentence control is uneven. The opening, “The pie chart and table illustrates results,” has subject–verb agreement and article problems, while the overview contains incomplete or poorly joined clauses, such as “Smaller half of academic staff and distance learning stududents.” Comma splices are common in the satisfaction paragraph, where separate statements are joined only by commas. There are also errors with plurals and verb forms, for example “other 35% was fairly satisfied” and “other 40% was fairly satisfied.” Use complete sentences, check agreement between percentages and verbs, and punctuate each comparison clearly.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.