Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart and table compares a survey results of library visitors at a iniversity.

Overall, it is evident that the highest proportion of library visitors are full-time undergratuates, while the least accounted for academic staff and distance learning. The services with which members are totally satisfied are library opening hours and staff helpfulness.

Among five caregories of library users full-time undergraduates makes up of less than half of share at 44%, while second peak visitors are full-time postgraduates makes share of 25%. Part-time postgraduates are the third most visiting members of library at 16%, which is double of all those leaners belonging from other courses and academic staff.

Satisfaction of users from library services is divided at three scales. Very satisfied has highest numbers in each service, while members belongs to not satisfied were the least. Availability of books has half proportion of very satisfied , while 40% belongs to fairly satisfied and least share of 10% are not satisfied. The satisfaction rate of availability of journals and wi-fi is nealy same at 45% and 48% respectively, whereas other two categories have nearly equal number of visitors at 35% and 33% for fairly satisfied and 20% and 19% for not satisfied.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main user group accurately: full-time undergraduates account for 44%, and you also report the 25% and 16% shares for postgraduate groups. The overview highlights the leading satisfaction results, and the service figures for books, journals and Wi-Fi are mostly reported correctly. This covers the task’s main features, but some details are incomplete or imprecise. In particular, academic staff (7%) and distance learners (8%) are described together as the least represented, although academic staff are the smallest group and distance learners are slightly more numerous. The statement that opening hours and staff helpfulness are the services users are “totally satisfied” with also overstates the data: 65% and 95% are very satisfied, while the remainder are fairly satisfied. A more precise overview and clearer comparison of all user categories would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on user categories and a final paragraph on satisfaction. This makes the two visuals easy to follow, and comparisons such as the similar satisfaction figures for journals and Wi-Fi help connect related information. However, some links are unclear or mechanically expressed. For example, “which is double of all those leaners belonging from other courses and academic staff” does not clearly identify which figures are being compared, and the final sentence packs several comparisons into one long structure. Use shorter, more controlled sentences and explicit references to the relevant categories. The paragraphing and general progression are effective, but clearer linking and more precise referencing would make the organisation smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “satisfaction,” “availability” and “categories,” and terms such as “full-time undergraduates” are appropriate for describing the chart. However, inaccurate word choice and collocation are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning less clear. Examples include “second peak visitors,” “makes share,” “totally satisfied,” and “members belongs to not satisfied.” “Visitors” is also repeated where “users” or “respondents” would be more precise. Spelling errors such as “iniversity,” “undergratuates,” “caregories” and “nealy” further limit accuracy. Aim for natural chart-description phrases, such as “accounted for,” “the second-largest group,” and “were very satisfied,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “while” and “whereas,” and the overall meaning is generally recoverable. However, errors in agreement, articles, verb forms and sentence construction are frequent enough to reduce grammatical control. For instance, “The pie chart and table compares” needs a plural verb, while “full-time undergraduates makes up” has a subject–verb agreement error and an incorrect verb pattern. In “members belongs to not satisfied,” the verb form and clause structure are faulty. The opening phrase “a survey results” also shows difficulty with articles and number. Practise building accurate comparison sentences with a clear subject and verb, and check agreement and article use before submitting. More reliable control of these patterns would make your range of structures more effective.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.