Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-15
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Categories of library users
Student answer (Band 5.0)
the bar chart and table depikes the declare of a research of library users at auniversity.
overall, it can be seen that, the higest library users full-time undergraduate. while academic staff are lowes use library. however the library user satisfation higest is helpfulness of staff.
to begin with, it can be noticed that , full time underaduate is a 44% and academic staff figur is onliy 7%. morever, full time postgraduate are 25% and distance lerning is drow 8%. furthar, part time postgraduate is almost 16%.
on the other hand, the library user satisfaction are opening hours very satisfield is almost 65% follwing figur decresd to 35% and last 0. however, helpfulness of staff 95% in very satisfied and after this onliy 5% and over the last 0. morevr, avaliability of books 50% in very satisfied and after word number drow to 40% . furthermore, reliability of wi-fi 48% is very satisfind and follwing this figur less them to onliy 33% in fairly satisfend.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You identify two important overall features: full-time undergraduates form the largest user group, while academic staff are the smallest, and staff helpfulness receives the strongest satisfaction rating. Several figures are also reported accurately, including 44%, 7%, 25%, 8%, and the opening-hours and staff-satisfaction results. However, the summary is only partial: it omits the 16% part-time postgraduate figure from the main comparison and gives no account of the dissatisfaction results for books, journals, or Wi-Fi. The table coverage is therefore uneven, and some details are unclear—for example, the Wi-Fi account stops at the fairly satisfied figure. Include the key contrasts across both visuals and make the overview more complete and precise.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a basic overall structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the user categories and satisfaction results. Phrases such as “to begin with” and “on the other hand” show an attempt to guide the reader. However, progression within the table paragraph is difficult to follow because the categories are listed without a consistent pattern, and some links are inaccurate or repetitive, including “morever,” “furthermore,” and “after this.” The final sentence ends without completing the comparison of Wi-Fi satisfaction. Organise the table information in a clear sequence, such as strongest satisfaction first and then the remaining categories, and use linking expressions only where they clarify the relationship between figures.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.5
You use some task-relevant terms, including “library users,” “very satisfied,” “fairly satisfied,” and “reliability of wi-fi,” so the topic is generally recognisable. However, the vocabulary range is limited and many spelling errors make the report harder to read: “depikes,” “higest,” “satisfation,” and “avaliability” are examples. Several expressions are also unnatural or imprecise, such as “the declare of a research” and “figur drow,” which do not clearly describe the data. Build a small bank of accurate chart language—such as “accounted for,” “the proportion,” and “fell to”—and check spelling and collocations carefully. This would make the comparisons clearer and more appropriate for an academic report.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
The response attempts a few longer structures, including the overview contrast beginning “while academic staff…” and the repeated comparisons in the table paragraph. However, most sentences rely on simple patterns, and errors in sentence construction and agreement are frequent enough to make some relationships unclear. For example, “the library user satisfaction are opening hours” lacks a clear grammatical connection between the subject and the category, while “full time underaduate is a 44%” has an incorrect article and sentence pattern. Articles, plurals, and punctuation are also inconsistently controlled. Practise writing complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, for example, “Full-time undergraduates accounted for 44% of users.” Then check agreement and sentence boundaries.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
