Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The pie chart illustrates the proportion of different categories of library users at a university, while the table provides information about their satisfaction levels regarding services.

Overall, about half of the library users are full-time undergraduates, while academic staff account for the smallest proportion. Additionally, more users are satisfied with helpfulness of staff, and the availability of journals registers the highest level of dissatisfaction.

Looking at the details, full-time graduates users are showing the highest percentage accounting for 44%. The second most largest category are full-time postgraduates users are about quarter at 25%. Moreover, part-time postgraduates users represent 16%, while distance learning and academic staff makes up almost similar ratio at 8% and 7% respectively.

Turning to satisfaction levels, majority of users are satisfied with helpfulness of staff accounting for 95% and 65% from opening hours. And 50% from availability of books, while satisfaction regarding availability of journals and reliability of wi-fi stands at almost same at 45% and 48% respectively. In terms of fairly satisfied users, the figures are 35% for opening hours, 5% for staff helpfulness, 40% for books, 35% for journals and 33% for wi-fi reliability. Finally, dissatisfaction is highest for the availability of journals at 20%, followed by wi-fi reliability at 19%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response covers both visuals and gives a clear overview of the main patterns: undergraduates form the largest user group, academic staff the smallest, and staff helpfulness receives the strongest satisfaction rating while journals attract the most dissatisfaction. Most figures are reported accurately. However, “full-time graduates users” is an important misidentification: the 44% group is full-time undergraduates, not graduates. The overview could also capture the broader satisfaction pattern more fully, such as the high ratings for opening hours and the comparatively mixed views of books and wi-fi. The response selects relevant details, but some comparisons are listed rather than interpreted, so the key features are not consistently developed with the precision needed for a stronger performance.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The organisation is clear and effective: an introduction is followed by an overview, then separate paragraphs for user categories and satisfaction results. Sequencing phrases such as “Overall,” “Looking at the details,” and “Turning to satisfaction levels” make the progression easy to follow. The figures are generally grouped logically, and the final sentence appropriately highlights the highest dissatisfaction results. Some linking is slightly mechanical, however, and the satisfaction paragraph becomes a long sequence of percentages. The sentence beginning “And 50% from availability of books” is also a fragment, interrupting the flow. Combining related figures into fuller comparisons would make cohesion more flexible and the paragraph easier to read.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

The response uses an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “account for,” “registers,” and “dissatisfaction,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more formal reporting language, such as “Turning to satisfaction levels.” Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward: “full-time graduates users” mislabels the category, “second most largest” is redundant, and “almost similar ratio” is not idiomatic. Repeated use of “users” and “satisfaction” also limits flexibility. More precise terms for the categories and more natural comparison phrases would improve control and help the report sound more fluent and exact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

There is a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, and several sentences communicate the data clearly, including the overview and the sentence comparing the two smallest user groups. Some grammatical errors remain, but they rarely prevent understanding. For example, “the second most largest category are” has both an incorrect superlative construction and subject–verb disagreement; “distance learning and academic staff makes up” also has agreement problems. “And 50% from availability of books” is an incomplete sentence, while “satisfaction regarding … stands” does not agree with the plural figures being described. Aim to make each data statement a complete sentence and check agreement and article use when presenting categories and percentages.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.