Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart and table below displays the results of a survey of library members at a university.

Overall, the largest proportion of users are full-time undergraduates while, the smallest proportion is contributed by individuals opting distance learning courses. The table clearly depicts the percentage of users satisfied with the place. This is the most for helpfulness of staff and least for journal's availability.

There are five categories with full time graduates contributing 44% of total members. This is followed by full time postgraduates sharing 25% only. There is not negligible difference between academic and distance learning courses's contribution to the total survey with 7% and 8% respectively. Part-time postgraduates constists of 16% of individuals only.

The table here illustrates the percentage of people satisfied with the facilities available there. The highest percentage is credited for helpfulness of staff bagging 95% with 0 percentage of people being not satisfied at all. Availability of journals and reliability of wi-fi has achieved 45% and 48% respectively to be able to satisfy users heavily. However, almost half of the total satisfied percentage is there for people who are not satisfied with these facilities at all that is 20% and 19% respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main user group correctly: full-time undergraduates account for 44%, while academic staff are the smallest group at 7%. You also report several satisfaction figures accurately, including 95% for staff helpfulness and 45% for journals. However, the overview is incomplete and partly misleading: distance learners at 8% are not the smallest group, and the table shows satisfaction levels rather than simply the percentage of users satisfied with the library as a whole. Some important comparisons are omitted, especially the strong results for opening hours (65% very satisfied, with no dissatisfaction) and the lower satisfaction for books. The final sentence also blurs the distinction between fairly satisfied and not satisfied. Select the clearest highs and lows and describe each satisfaction category precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on user categories and a paragraph on satisfaction. This gives the reader a coherent overall route through the two visuals. Some links between ideas are less clear, however. In the overview, “This” in “This is the most for helpfulness of staff” has no clear reference, and the transition from the user categories to the table is rather abrupt. The final sentence combines several figures and interpretations in a way that is difficult to follow. Use clearer topic sentences and group the satisfaction data into meaningful comparisons—for example, the strongest results first, followed by areas with more dissatisfaction. Avoid connectors such as “However” when the contrast is not fully explained.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “contributing,” “availability” and “reliability,” and the meaning is generally understandable. There are also attempts at more varied phrasing, such as “credited for” and “bagging,” but these are not natural in formal data reporting. Several expressions are imprecise or awkward, including “satisfied with the place,” “satisfy users heavily” and “percentage of users satisfied with the place.” Spelling and word-form slips such as “constists” and “courses's” also reduce accuracy. Prefer standard chart language and precise terms for the response categories: users were “very satisfied,” “fairly satisfied” or “not satisfied.” This would make the account more natural and exact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a contrast introduced by “while” and a relative clause in “people who are not satisfied.” The main information is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “The pie chart and table below displays” has a subject–verb agreement error, and “There is not negligible difference” uses an incorrect article and construction. In “Availability of journals and reliability of wi-fi has achieved,” the compound subject requires a plural verb, and the sentence structure does not clearly express what the percentages represent. Punctuation also needs attention, particularly the comma after “while” in the overview. Aim for shorter, controlled comparisons and check agreement, articles and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.