Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart illustrates the proportion of the library user of five different categories.

The table chart depicts the percentage of the library user satisfaction.

Looking at the pie chart, full- time undergraduate has the largest proportion constitued for 44%, following by full-time postgraduate accounted for 25%. Moreover, part-time postgraduate category has 16%, while distance learing has half of the part-time postgraduate figure 8%. Meanwhile, academic staff share the lowest percentage across all categories. The table chart demonstrates the satisfication of library user; regarding to opening time 65% are very satisfied and 35% are moderate satisfied. helpfulness of staff has highest figure of very satisfied user 95% and only 5% has fairly satisfied. Availability of books has 50% of very satisfied and 40% of moderate satisfied and only 10% are not satisfied. Furthermore, availability of journals has 45% of satisfied user and 35% are fairly satisfied and 20% are not satisfied. Wi-fi reliability is at 48% of fully satisfied and 33% are at moderate and 19% have issue on wi-fi.

Overall, the full-time udergradute had the highest number, in contrast academic staff had lowest figure. While, in the user satisfication section most of the figure are very satisfied and moderate percentage are in fairly satisfied and least porportion of not satisfied.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover both visuals and identify the main user group and the strongest satisfaction result: full-time undergraduates account for 44%, while staff helpfulness receives 95% very satisfied responses. Most figures are reported accurately, and you also note the low 7% share for academic staff and the 20% dissatisfied with journals. This gives the response a relevant overview and adequate detail. However, the overview is broad rather than sharply comparative: “most of the figure are very satisfied” does not distinguish staff helpfulness and opening hours from the more mixed ratings for books, journals and wi-fi. Some descriptions are also imprecise, such as calling 45% for journals simply “satisfied” rather than very satisfied. A clearer synthesis of the satisfaction patterns would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure: it introduces the two visuals, describes the user categories, moves to satisfaction data, and ends with an overview. This overall progression makes the information reasonably easy to follow, and linking expressions such as “Moreover,” “Meanwhile” and “Furthermore” help connect details. However, the final overview repeats points already made and is not clearly separated from the preceding discussion by a distinct paragraph. Some transitions feel mechanical, and the long table-description sequence places many figures in one block. Grouping the satisfaction results—for example, the strongest ratings first, followed by the more mixed categories—would create clearer progression. Ensure contrast markers such as “While” connect complete, logically balanced clauses.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “proportion,” “category,” “availability,” “reliability” and “satisfied,” so the reader can understand the subject and most comparisons. There is some attempt to vary expressions, such as “largest proportion” and “lowest percentage.” However, noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision: “constituted” is not suitable for describing a share, “satisfication” is misspelled, and “moderate satisfied” is an inaccurate form. Phrases such as “has issue on wi-fi” and “highest number” are also imprecise for percentage data. Aim for accurate collocations and consistent labels from the table, especially “fairly satisfied,” “very satisfied” and “not satisfied.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, and the meaning is generally recoverable. For example, the category comparisons use clauses linked by “while” and “Moreover,” and the table details are mostly expressed in a clear subject–verb pattern. However, errors in agreement, articles and sentence construction recur. Examples include “full-time undergraduate has,” “the proportion of the library user,” and “65% are very satisfied,” where the subject or noun phrase needs more accurate grammatical handling. The final sentence beginning “While” is a fragment, and “Meanwhile, academic staff share…” lacks a clear article or plural construction. Work on complete clauses, singular/plural agreement and consistent sentence patterns; these corrections would make the report more controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.