Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The provided pie chart illustrates the proportion of different categories of library users at a university. While, the table display the survey results regarding the user satisfaction levels measured in percentage.

Overall, it is evident that Full-time undergraduate students recorded the highest proportion of the chart. Whereas, Academic staff account for the smallest proportion of the chart. Additionally, regarding user satisfaction levels, helpfulness of staff received the highest positive rating from users.

Focusing on the pie chart, Full-time undergraduate users accounted for the highest proportion at 44%. Additionally, a similar pattern was seen in Full-time postgraduate users that contains 25% of the data. combined these two categories account for 69% area of the chart. Academic staff represents the smallest proportion. Rest of the categories distance category and part-time postgraduate account for 16% and 8% respectively.

Turning to the table regarding user satisfaction, the helpfulness of staff received the highest positive rating, with 95% of users being very satisfied and only 5% fairly satisfied. Similarly, 65% of users were very satisfied with the library opening hours, while the remaining 35% were fairly satisfied, with 0% reporting dissatisfaction. Furthermore, for the availability of books, 50% were very satisfied, 40% fairly satisfied, and 10% not satisfied.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main user group and the smallest group accurately, and your overview also highlights the strongest satisfaction result. The figures for undergraduates, postgraduates, staff, opening hours, staff helpfulness and book availability are generally reported correctly. However, coverage is uneven: the final paragraph omits the results for journals and Wi-Fi, both of which would help complete the comparison of satisfaction levels. There is also a factual mix-up in the pie-chart paragraph: distance learners account for 8%, while part-time postgraduates make up 16%, but these are reversed in your final sentence. Your overview is relevant, though a fuller summary of the table’s contrasting results would make the response more complete and developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear four-paragraph structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the chart and table. The progression from the largest and smallest user groups to satisfaction results is easy to follow, and phrases such as “Focusing on the pie chart” and “Turning to the table” guide the reader effectively. Some linking is less controlled: “While” begins a sentence fragment-like contrast, and “Whereas” introduces a standalone sentence rather than being integrated with the preceding point. The repeated use of “Additionally” and “Furthermore” also makes some transitions feel formulaic. More varied, precise links between comparisons would make the cohesion more flexible and natural.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use a suitable range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “accounted for,” “positive rating,” and “dissatisfaction,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are, however, some imprecise or awkward choices that limit flexibility. “Contains 25% of the data” is not a natural way to describe a share of library users, while “69% area of the chart” is unnecessarily literal. “Distance category” is also unclear, and “recorded the highest proportion of the chart” could be expressed more precisely. Aim for consistent terms such as “share,” “percentage,” and “respondents,” and use the exact category labels when comparing groups. These refinements would make the vocabulary more accurate and idiomatic.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You attempt a mix of simple and more complex structures, including the contrast in the opening and the combined comparison of the two largest groups. Most sentences remain understandable, but some grammatical errors are noticeable. In “While, the table display,” the comma after “While” is unnecessary, “display” should agree with the singular subject, and the clause needs to be joined to the preceding sentence. “Whereas, Academic staff account…” has a similar punctuation and clause-joining problem. There are also inconsistent capitalisation and sentence boundaries in “combined these two categories,” and “users that contains 25%” has faulty agreement and reference. Check subject–verb agreement, punctuation around subordinate clauses, and sentence starts to improve accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.