Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-18

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

the pie chart illustrates the percentages of different types of library users, while the table compares use satisfaction with five aspects of the library.

overall,full time underaduate students makeup the largest proportion of library users, whereas academic staff account for the smallest percentage.regrading satisfaction,the helpfullness of staff receives the highest rating,while the availability of journals and the reliability pf wifi receive comparatively lower levels of staisfaction

according to pie chart, full yime undergraduate students represent 44 percent of library users,making them the largest group. full time postgraduate students account for 25 % followed by part time postgraduate students at 16%.meanwhile,distance learning students makeup 8% of user s,which is slightly higher than the figure for academic staff,at 7%

the table showa that 95 percent of libaray user sre very staisfied with thw helpfullness of staff, while remaining 5 percent are fairlt staisfied. Similarly,65%are very satisfied with thw libaray's opening hours and 35 percent are fairly satisfied. regarding avaliable of books, half of the users are very satisfied and 10 percent are not satisfied.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main user group accurately (full-time undergraduates at 44%) and the smallest (academic staff at 7%), and your overview also highlights staff helpfulness as the strongest satisfaction result. The figures you report for user categories and the two leading satisfaction rows are accurate. However, the overview’s claim that journals and Wi-Fi are comparatively less satisfying is not fully supported by the details that follow: you omit both rows, as well as the satisfaction figures for books that would complete that comparison. The table coverage is therefore less complete than the chart coverage, and some key features are underdeveloped. Include the journal and Wi-Fi ratings and compare their very-satisfied and not-satisfied proportions to make the summary more balanced.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an opening identifies the two visuals, an overview states the main patterns, and the final paragraphs present supporting figures. Linking expressions such as “overall,” “meanwhile,” and “similarly” help show relationships between points. However, the progression within the table discussion is incomplete: it moves from staff helpfulness to opening hours and books, then stops without covering journals or Wi-Fi, despite mentioning them in the overview. Some transitions and sentence boundaries are also difficult to follow because of missing spaces after full stops and commas. Grouping the table results into a clear comparison of the strongest and weaker satisfaction areas would make the organisation more complete and cohesive.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “percentages,” “proportion,” “account for,” and “very satisfied,” and you vary some expressions when describing the figures. However, spelling errors are frequent enough to distract, for example “underaduate,” “helpfullness,” “regrading,” and “staisfaction.” There are also inaccurate or awkward word choices and collocations, such as “use satisfaction” and “the availability of books” where “satisfaction with the availability of books” is intended. These issues limit the precision and control of the vocabulary, even though the main meaning is generally recoverable. Proofread carefully and use consistent terms such as “library users” and “satisfaction with” each service or facility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a contrast with “while” and a comparison using “which is slightly higher than.” Most of the intended relationships between figures can be understood. Some grammatical and punctuation errors remain, however. For example, “the table showa” has subject–verb disagreement, and “full time undergraduate students represent 44 percent” needs consistent hyphenation and article use in this context. Several sentences run together because spaces after punctuation are missing, and the opening sentence’s phrasing (“compares use satisfaction”) does not form a clear grammatical relationship. Check agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries, while retaining the useful variety of structures you already attempt.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.