Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-19
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Categories of library users
Student answer (Band 6.5)
The pie chart and table illustrate the outcome of a survey of library users conducted at a university.
Overall, the full-time undergraduate accounted for a highest proportion of the categories of library users, while the academic learning had the lowest share. Meanwhile, in the table, the satisfaction of helpfulness of staff recorded the highest percentage of the very satisfied users without the not satisfied user.
Regarding categories of library users, the full-time undergraduate represented nearly one-half of the share, at 44%, followed by the full-time postgraduate at 25%, which was more than twice of that the part-time postgraduate at 16% and the distance learning at 8%. Meanwhile, the academic staff stood at 7%, representing the lowest proportion among the categories.
Regarding the library user satisfaction, the helpfulness of staff achieved the highest percentage of the very-satisfied users, at 95%, while the fairly-satisfied at 5 and the not-satisfied at 0%. The availability of books recorded one-half of the share as very satisfied, with the remaining 40% as fairly satisfied and 10% as not satisfied. Meanwhile, 35% of users were fairly satisfied with the availability of journals, while 20% users were not satisfied, which was the highest figure among the categories.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.5 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You cover both visuals and select several relevant comparisons. The overview identifies the dominant user group and the strongest satisfaction result, and the figures for user categories are accurately reported. You also correctly note that journal dissatisfaction is the highest among the listed services. However, the overview says “academic learning” had the smallest share, which misidentifies the category: it is academic staff. The satisfaction summary is also incomplete: opening hours (65% very satisfied, 35% fairly satisfied) and wi-fi reliability (48%, 33%, 19%) are omitted, so the main patterns across the table are not fully conveyed. To strengthen the response, include these contrasting results and make the overview cover the broad satisfaction pattern, not only staff helpfulness.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0
The response has a clear, useful structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the user categories and satisfaction results. The repeated “Regarding” openings make the shift between visuals easy to follow, while “Overall,” “Meanwhile,” and “followed by” help signal relationships. The sequence within the user-category paragraph is particularly logical, moving from the largest group to the smallest. Some linking is slightly mechanical, and the final paragraph stops after the journal figures rather than completing the comparison across all satisfaction categories. More varied transitions and a concluding comparison that includes opening hours and wi-fi would make the progression feel more complete and flexible.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.5
You use an adequate range of task-relevant vocabulary, including “accounted for,” “represented,” “proportion,” and “recorded,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also some attempts at more formal reporting language. However, several phrases are imprecise or awkward: “academic learning” does not name the category shown, “the highest percentage of the very-satisfied users” is cumbersome, and “more than twice of that the part-time postgraduate” is not a natural comparison. Repeated use of “share” and “percentage” also limits flexibility. Choose precise category labels and use standard chart language such as “the largest group,” “the proportion of users,” and “compared with.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5
You use a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, including comparisons and clauses introduced by “while” and “which.” Most sentences communicate the intended figures, and errors rarely prevent understanding. Some grammatical inaccuracies remain, however. In “accounted for a highest proportion,” the article should be “the”; “more than twice of that the part-time postgraduate” has an incomplete comparison structure; and “20% users” needs “of” before “users.” The phrase “the fairly-satisfied at 5” also lacks a clear noun phrase. Review articles, comparison patterns, and percentage constructions, then proofread for complete parallel phrasing when listing satisfaction levels.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
