Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-19

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The pie chart and table demonstrate the results of a study of library users at a university.

Overall, it is rapidly apparent that the full-time undergraduate users had the biggest proportion, while academic staff shared least area. Additionally, most of the users were very satisfied, whereas least users had not satisfied.

Delving deeper into the details, full-time undergraduate contributed the highest proportion accounting for 44%, whereas full-time postgraduate users recorded slightly lower which were observed as 25%. Moreover, distance learning and academic staff users represented smallest shares were 8%, and 7% respectively. Part-time postgraduate users recorded moderately by 16%.

Looking towards the users satisfied details, it shared three categories of satisfaction. Library opening hours, most of the users were very satisfied accounting for 65%, while 35% were fairly satisfied and none were not satisfied. Furthermore, helpful library staff received very satisfied shared by 95%, fairly satisfied figured by 5%, and 0% for not satisfied. Availability of journals and availability of books represented 45% and 50% of very satisfied, and 35% and 40% observed fairly satisfied, users who were not satisfied comprised 20%, 10% respectively. At last, reliability of wi-fi rated by 48% of very satisfied, whereas 33% of fairly satisfied, and 19% of the users were not satisfied.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.5

You cover both visuals and report the key figures accurately: undergraduates form the largest user group at 44%, academic staff the smallest at 7%, and the satisfaction percentages are correctly given for all five aspects. The overview also identifies the broad contrast between the largest and smallest user groups and the generally high satisfaction levels. This gives the response clear coverage and relevant support. To make the summary more fully developed, highlight the most notable satisfaction comparisons: staff helpfulness has the highest very-satisfied figure (95%), while journals have the lowest (45%) and the highest dissatisfaction (20%). The claim that “most of the users were very satisfied” is somewhat broad, since satisfaction varies by service, so qualify it as a general pattern rather than a single overall result.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on user categories, and a final paragraph covering satisfaction. The progression from the chart to the table is easy to follow, and linking expressions such as “Overall,” “Moreover,” and “Furthermore” help signal relationships. However, some transitions feel formulaic or do not clarify the comparison, particularly “Delving deeper into the details” and “At last.” The final paragraph also packs several service categories and figures into one long sequence, making comparisons harder to absorb. Grouping the satisfaction results by stronger versus weaker ratings, or using shorter sentences for each comparison, would make cohesion more flexible and the information easier to scan.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “accounting for,” “represented,” and “satisfaction,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “Delving deeper into the details.” However, several choices are unnatural or imprecise: “shared least area” does not describe a chart proportion naturally, “recorded moderately by 16%” is unclear, and “very satisfied shared by 95%” is an awkward collocation. “At last” is also not the natural way to introduce the final item in a data summary. Aim for precise, conventional reporting language such as “accounted for,” “stood at,” and “the proportion of users who were satisfied.” This would improve accuracy and naturalness without requiring more elaborate vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including clauses with “while” and “whereas,” and most of the data remains understandable. Some grammatical errors nevertheless recur. For example, “full-time postgraduate users recorded slightly lower which were observed as 25%” has an unclear clause structure and missing grammatical links; “distance learning and academic staff users represented smallest shares were 8%, and 7%” combines clauses incorrectly and omits “the.” In “Library opening hours, most of the users were very satisfied,” the opening phrase is not grammatically connected to the main clause. There are also awkward constructions such as “it shared three categories.” Practise building complete comparison sentences with a clear subject and verb, and check articles, clause boundaries, and parallel structures. More accurate complex sentences would strengthen control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.