Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The survey conducted at university about library users are shwon in chart and table. In this, they shared data about different types of user categories. Full-time undergraduate student numbers cover 44% and full-time postgraduate students on second higher position with one quartar portion.Subsequintly, 16% based on part-time postgraduate and on the lower side distance learning students enrolled in different courses. The least numbers of students use library are academic staff, only 7% staff members participate in library activities.

In survey also collected data on user satisfaction on multiple facilities. Students reviewed about opening hours, 65% choosed very satisfied and 35% on the side of fairly satisfied and no one picked not statisfied. On the other hand, 95% agreed on very satisfied about helpfulness of staff, while just 5% selected fair and no one go with not satisfied, In availability of books survey, half decided very satisfied, 40% picked fair and 10% gives a negative review. In another section of survey question journals availability are also student minor concern because 20% not agreed, 35% picked average option and only 45% agreed on very satisfied. Lastly, wi-fi reliability also issue for only few members, 19% not satisfied, 33% fairly satisfied and higer number almost 48% decided very satisfied.

Overall, mostly student choosed vary satisfied about the different services of library. Meanwhile around 35 to 40% selcted fairly and around 20% picked not satisfied only in 3 out of 5 options.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover both parts of the visual and report the main user categories and all five satisfaction areas. The figures are generally accurate, and you identify useful contrasts, such as staff helpfulness receiving 95% very satisfied responses and journals having the highest dissatisfaction at 20%. Your final overview also recognises that very satisfied responses predominate. This gives the response a clear, relevant summary, though some comparisons are less fully developed: for example, the user-category figures could be ranked more explicitly, and the overview’s claim that dissatisfaction occurs in “only in 3 out of 5 options” is less informative than identifying the strongest and weakest results. Avoid interpreting satisfaction as agreement or describing respondents as students when the table refers to library users generally. A sharper overview and more precise comparisons would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a sensible overall structure: it first describes user categories, then satisfaction results, and ends with an overview. Sequencing expressions such as “On the other hand,” “In another section,” and “Lastly” help readers follow the movement through the table. The organisation is coherent, but some linking is mechanical or imprecise, and the long second paragraph presents several separate facilities in a dense sequence. The final overview repeats the general point that most users were very satisfied without clearly synthesising the strongest and weakest ratings. Use clearer grouping—for example, compare the two strongest service ratings together, then discuss books, journals and wi-fi—and ensure each transition expresses the relationship between ideas accurately. This would make progression more deliberate and cohesion less dependent on repeated sequencing phrases.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “user satisfaction,” “availability,” “reliability,” and “very satisfied,” so the reader can understand the main subject and results. However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or awkward, as in “numbers cover 44%,” “on the lower side,” “picked a negative review,” and “students minor concern.” Some terms also misrepresent the response scale: “agreed” and “average option” are not equivalent to satisfaction categories. Spelling errors such as “shwon,” “quartar,” “Subsequintly,” and “statisified” are noticeable and reduce precision. Build a more reliable set of chart-reporting phrases, such as “accounted for,” “ranked second,” “selected fairly satisfied,” and “expressed dissatisfaction,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of simple statements and longer sentences, including clauses linked with “while” and “because.” However, grammatical control is inconsistent, and errors occur in basic sentence patterns as well as longer constructions. For example, “The survey … users are shown” has faulty agreement and passive construction, while “Full-time postgraduate students on second higher position” is not a complete sentence. There are also problems with articles, plurals and verb forms, as in “In survey,” “95% agreed on very satisfied,” and “mostly student choosed.” Punctuation is sometimes used to join separate statements, particularly in the long satisfaction paragraph. Practise complete subject–verb structures and accurate reporting patterns, such as “Forty-four per cent of users were full-time undergraduates” and “95% were very satisfied with staff helpfulness.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.