Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given pie chart and table provides the data about individuals utillizing library in university

Overall, the full time undergraduate pupils utillize library in university contribute upto 44 percent where as, the academic staff contibute the least which is less then 7 percent . The library users are satisfied most with the help provided by staff where as most of the pupils are unsatisfied by the availability of journals.

Gernally, full time under graduates are utillizing the library however, the full time postrgraduates are second to them with 25 percent . Similarliy , parttime postgraduates utillize upto 16 percent which is double to distance learning pupils utillization. However , academic ones are leat utillizing ones.

One other hand, if we talk about satisfaction of users, mostly users are satisfied with staffs accomodation.More then half users are delighted with opening hours of library whereas , just half of them are happy with availability of books . In addition , less then 50 percent are satisfied with availibilty of journals and wifi reliability respectivelly.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover both visuals and give a clear overview: undergraduates form the largest user group, academic staff the smallest, and staff helpfulness receives the strongest satisfaction rating. These are relevant main features, and the user-group figures are generally reported accurately. The comparison that part-time postgraduates are double the distance-learning group is also correct. However, some details are imprecise: academic staff account for 7%, not less than 7%, and the table shows 20% are not satisfied with journals, compared with 19% for wi-fi; describing journal availability as the main source of dissatisfaction is therefore reasonable, but could be supported with the figures. The final paragraph groups several satisfaction results together without reporting the notable 95% staff-helpfulness figure or the 0% dissatisfaction for opening hours and staff. More precise selection and development of these comparisons would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on user categories and a final paragraph on satisfaction. This gives the reader a coherent overall route through the two visuals. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, with repeated transitions such as “whereas,” “however” and “in addition,” and some links do not clearly express the relationship between the figures. For example, “full time postgraduates are second to them” is understandable but the reference to “them” is not especially precise. The satisfaction paragraph also moves quickly from staff to opening hours, books, journals and wi-fi without a clear comparison pattern. Grouping the highest ratings together and then comparing the lower ratings would make the organisation more controlled and easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “satisfied,” “availability,” “reliability” and “contribute,” and you attempt alternatives such as “delighted” and “happy.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “pupils utilization,” “staffs accomodation” and “academic ones.” Repeated use of “utillize” also makes the description less precise; “account for” or “make up” would suit proportions better. Spelling errors such as “postrgraduates,” “Similarliy” and “availibilty” are noticeable and can slow the reader. Aim for accurate, conventional chart language and check spelling carefully. Using the labels from the visual—such as “full-time undergraduates” and “distance-learning users”—would also improve precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and more complex sentences, including comparisons with “whereas” and clauses introduced by “if.” The main meaning is generally recoverable, but some grammatical errors recur. The opening sentence has subject–verb disagreement: “chart and table provides” should be “chart and table provide.” In “the academic staff contibute the least which is less then 7 percent,” the relative clause is awkwardly attached and the figure needs a clearer grammatical construction. Articles and number forms are also inconsistent, as in “utilize library in university” and “full time under graduates.” Punctuation around linking words is sometimes misplaced, particularly before “whereas.” More accurate sentence patterns and careful proofreading would improve control while preserving your attempts at complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.