Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-23

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The pie chart illustrates the information about different kind of users, while the table provides information about reviews of user of library at a university during a survey.

Firstly, library mostly used by full-time undergraduates which cover 44%of chart, which is followed by full-time postgraduates that cover quatar of chart and approximatly three time more than distance learners. Futher more, academic staff cover least portion of chart (7%) that is followed by distance learner(8%), while part-time learners showed a modorate catagrie that is roughly one third of full-time undergraduates.

Secondly, the statisfication is showed by most of the visters about the facilities. The reviewes about help full staff showed the highest percentage of satisfication(95%). In contrast, the availability of journals cover least percentage for satisfication (45%), while slight satisfication by aviliability of books and helpfullstaff showed highest and lowest percentages 40% and 5% respectively. Dis satisfication are not showed for library openinig hours and cooperative staff.

Overall, full time undergraduates had showed the highest percentage category of users and higest dissatisfactionis showed for journals availability.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main user group correctly: full-time undergraduates account for 44%, and you also note that academic staff are the smallest group at 7%. The overview that journals have the highest dissatisfaction is also supported by the table. However, several comparisons are inaccurate or unclear: part-time postgraduates are 16%, not roughly one third of the undergraduate share, and the table shows no dissatisfaction with opening hours or staff helpfulness—not “cooperative staff.” Some key satisfaction figures are omitted or confused; for example, 40% is the fairly satisfied figure for books, not a measure of slight satisfaction. To make the summary more complete, report the main patterns across both visuals accurately and distinguish satisfaction categories clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from the user categories to satisfaction results and ending with an overall statement. “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “Overall” help signal these stages, and the reader can generally follow the intended comparisons. However, the progression is sometimes weakened by unclear links within sentences. For example, the sentence beginning “while slight satisfication…” combines figures from different satisfaction categories without making their relationship clear. The final overview also repeats the user-group point rather than bringing together the strongest findings from both visuals. Use separate, focused sentences for the chart and table, and make each comparison explicit so the cohesion feels less mechanical and the information is easier to track.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt task-relevant vocabulary such as “percentage,” “availability,” “satisfaction,” and “dissatisfaction,” and you use some comparison language, including “followed by” and “in contrast.” However, the range is limited and frequent spelling and word-choice problems make parts difficult to understand: “quatar,” “Futher more,” “statisfication,” and “modorate catagrie” obscure otherwise relevant points. Some expressions are also unnatural, such as “cover 44% of chart” and “slight satisfaction by availability of books.” Choose standard chart-reporting collocations and check spelling carefully. For instance, describe a group as “accounting for” a share, and refer to respondents as “very satisfied,” “fairly satisfied,” or “not satisfied” rather than using vague labels such as “reviews.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You make some attempts to combine ideas using relative clauses and contrast, as in “which is followed by…” and “while…,” but the sentence structures are often faulty, and errors sometimes make the intended meaning hard to follow. Examples include “library mostly used by full-time undergraduates,” which lacks an auxiliary verb, and “full-time postgraduates that cover quatar of chart,” where the clause and article use are problematic. There are also agreement and verb-form issues in “The statisfication is showed” and “full time undergraduates had showed.” Aim first for accurate simple sentences with a clear subject and verb, then add complex clauses selectively. Check articles, verb forms, and sentence boundaries when revising.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.