Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-23

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The above pie chart and table illustrates the outcome of different categories of library users and their satisfaction at a university.

Overall, full-time undergraduates were accounted for the largest portion of library users, whereas, academic staff made up the smallest share.Regarding satisfaction of users, helpfulness of staff was highly rated while, reliability of wifi recieved the lowest level of satisfaction.

According to the pie chart, full-time undergraduate represented 44% of library users followed by full-time postgraduate at 25%. Part-time postgraduate held 16% wieghtage while distant learners were accounted for 8%.Remaining 7% were academic staff.

If we look up at table, library users were highly satisfied by the helpfulness of the staff rating 95%. Library opening hours were rated 65% of very satisfies users while 35% of users were fairly satisfied. Least satisfied user rating is 45% occupied by the vailability of journals ,whereas, it occupy very high rating of non satisfied users which are 20%. Only 48% of users are very satisfied by the reilability of wifi ,however, 19% of the users are not satisfied by it while remaining 33% are fairly satisfied.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main user-group pattern accurately: full-time undergraduates are the largest group at 44%, and academic staff are the smallest at 7%. You also select relevant satisfaction results, including the 95% very-satisfied rating for staff helpfulness and the 20% dissatisfied with journal availability. This gives the response a clear overview and covers both visuals. However, some comparisons are incomplete: you do not report the satisfaction figures for books, and you describe Wi-Fi as having the lowest satisfaction without clarifying that journals have the lowest very-satisfied share (45%) and the highest dissatisfied share (20%). The overview is therefore useful but not fully precise, and some selected features are less fully developed than others.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction and overview are followed by a paragraph on user categories and one on satisfaction. This makes the information easy to locate, and phrases such as “According to the pie chart” and “If we look up at table” signal the shift between visuals. The overview also helps establish the main comparisons before the details. To make the progression more controlled, group the satisfaction figures consistently by rating or by service, and use linking expressions more accurately. For example, “whereas” in the journals sentence does not clearly connect the two ratings, and the final paragraph moves between opening hours, journals and Wi-Fi without covering books. More precise referencing and cleaner punctuation around transitions would strengthen cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “largest portion,” “smallest share,” “highly rated” and “fairly satisfied,” so the main information is generally understandable. There are also attempts to vary expression, such as “held 16%” and “made up.” However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for describing data: “accounted for” is used in the awkward phrase “were accounted for,” “weightage” is not suitable here, and “very satisfies users” is an incorrect form. Spelling errors such as “recieved,” “wieghtage,” “distant,” “vailability” and “reilability” also reduce precision. Prefer standard chart language such as “accounted for 16%” and check spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and more complex sentences, including comparisons with “whereas” and clauses introduced by “while” and “however.” Most of the data remains understandable, but some grammatical errors affect accuracy. In the opening, “chart and table illustrates” has a subject–verb agreement error; it should be “illustrate.” The phrase “full-time undergraduate represented 44%” needs a plural or a more suitable noun phrase, and “library users were highly satisfied by the helpfulness” uses an awkward passive construction. There are also punctuation and spacing problems, such as “share.Regarding” and missing spaces after full stops. Review agreement, sentence boundaries and the grammatical patterns used to compare percentages.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.