Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart illustrates the result of a survey of library users at a university and their categories while table compares the satisfaction level of library users .

Overall , full- time undrgraduate was highest category among others to visit library with 44%. while, academic staff remained the lowest category to go to library.

By examining the pie chart in more depth,percentage of full -time postgraduate stood at 25%, part-time rose to 16% and distance learning with 8%.

According to table chart ,95% of users were extremely satisfied with helpfulness of staff while olny 5% were hardly satisfied . 65% of users were fully satisfied with library opening timings, whereas , 35% were barely satisfied . 50% were deeply happy with the availability of books at library while 40% seemed fairly satisfied and 10% not satisfied . For reliability of wi-fi , 48% heartly satisfied coversely only 35% seemed not. Lastly , availability of journals impressesd 48% users while 19% were not satisfied .

To sum up , full time undergraduate recorded the highest ratio of visiting library while most of the people seemed satisfied with library.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both the user categories and satisfaction results, and the overview correctly identifies full-time undergraduates as the largest group and academic staff as the smallest. Several figures are reported accurately, including 44%, 25%, 16%, 8%, and the opening-hours and staff-satisfaction results. However, some key details are misreported: 35% were fairly satisfied with Wi-Fi, not dissatisfied, and 48% refers to very satisfied users for journals, rather than the overall number impressed. The overview also generalises that most users were satisfied without highlighting the strongest contrast: staff helpfulness received the highest satisfaction, while journals had the largest dissatisfied share. More precise comparisons and accurate reporting of these less-developed details would make the summary more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable progression: an introduction, an overview, details about user categories, and then satisfaction figures. This makes the main information accessible, and phrases such as “By examining the pie chart” and “According to table” signal shifts between visuals. The final sentence, however, repeats the overview rather than adding a useful concluding comparison, and the satisfaction details are presented in a long sequence that makes the relationships between categories less clear. Some linking punctuation is also awkward, as in “whereas ,” and “while, academic staff.” To strengthen the organisation, group related satisfaction results and use comparisons to connect them, rather than relying mainly on a list of figures.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of vocabulary for describing survey results, including “category,” “satisfaction level,” “availability,” and “reliability.” However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for formal data reporting. “Extremely satisfied,” “hardly satisfied,” “deeply happy,” and “heartly satisfied” do not consistently match the table’s categories of very, fairly, and not satisfied. “Impressesd 48% users” is also an unsuitable way to describe a satisfaction percentage. Spelling errors such as “undrgraduate,” “olny,” and “conversely” further reduce precision. Aim for consistent, neutral terms such as “very satisfied” and “not satisfied,” and use standard reporting collocations like “accounted for” or “the proportion of users.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response includes both simple statements and some more complex comparisons, for example, “65% of users were fully satisfied … whereas 35% were barely satisfied.” Most of the intended meaning remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. The opening sentence lacks a clear article and has an awkward clause structure: “The pie chart illustrates the result … and their categories while table compares…” There are also problems with sentence boundaries and punctuation, including the lower-case “while” after a full stop and inconsistent commas around “whereas.” In “full-time postgraduate stood at 25%, part-time rose to 16%,” the second item lacks a clear noun phrase. Use complete, parallel clauses and check articles, punctuation, and sentence boundaries to improve accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.