Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The chart illustrates the categories of people who uses library as percentage. Whereas the table depicts the how much each type of user is satisfied with the library.

Overall, the library users comprise of different individuals ranging from academic staffs to students. Full-time ungraduates are most common users whereas academic staffs use the library least. Additionally, the library is categorised into three staisfactory levels by the users.

Full-time undergraduates with 44% use the library most. After them, full-time post graduates covers 25% of the overall proportion and part-time postgraduates, distance learners and academic staffs use the least (16%, 8% & 7% respectively).

Library's satisfactory level is categorised as; very satisfied, fairly satisfied and not satisfied. Helpful staff, library's opening hours and availibility of books 50% and more very satisfied remarks. On the other hand, availibility of journals and reliable wi-fi got unsatisfactory remarks (19% & 20% respectively).

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main user group accurately: full-time undergraduates account for 44%, while academic staff are the smallest group at 7%, and you report the other user shares correctly. However, the satisfaction table is only partly covered. You note that staff helpfulness and opening hours receive high satisfaction, but do not give their figures, and the statement that books receive 50% or more very-satisfied responses is inaccurate: books are exactly 50%. You also describe journals and Wi-Fi as receiving “unsatisfactory remarks” without clearly distinguishing the not-satisfied figures from the larger satisfied groups. The overview is relevant but general. The response is three words below the required minimum; develop the comparisons and include a clearer summary of the satisfaction results.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for user categories and satisfaction. This makes the main information reasonably easy to follow, and transitions such as “Overall,” “After them,” and “On the other hand” help signal relationships. However, the final paragraph combines several satisfaction results without a clear order or enough explanation, so the comparison between categories is difficult to track. The phrase “50% and more very satisfied remarks” also leaves unclear which figures apply to which services. Improve progression by grouping the strongest satisfaction results together, then comparing books, journals, and Wi-Fi, and use explicit references to each category. This would make the organisation more consistently clear rather than relying on broad linking phrases.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “categories,” “satisfied,” and “reliable,” and the reader can generally understand your comparisons. There are, however, several inaccurate or awkward choices that reduce precision: “satisfactory level” is not the natural term for survey responses, “unsatisfactory remarks” does not clearly describe the not-satisfied percentage, and “covers 25%” is an imprecise way to report a share. Spelling errors such as “staisfactory” and “availibility” are also noticeable. Aim for standard chart language and consistent terms, such as “accounted for,” “satisfaction levels,” and “not satisfied.” More precise collocations would help you describe the data clearly without changing the meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including the contrast introduced by “Whereas” and the overview beginning “Overall.” Meaning is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “people who uses library” has subject–verb agreement and article problems, while “the table depicts the how much” contains an unnecessary article and an awkward clause structure. “Full-time undergraduates with 44% use the library most” is also not formed naturally as a comparison. The semicolon in “categorised as;” is incorrectly used before a list. Work on agreement, articles, and sentence patterns for reporting percentages, such as “Full-time undergraduates made up 44% of users.” Greater accuracy in these recurring structures would strengthen the response.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.