Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart illustrates five categories of library users and the table gives the information about users satisfaction depending upon the facilities provided by the library.

According to the information given in the pie chart, the majority of library users are full time ungraduate students which stands approximately at 44%, whereas the least amount of users are academic staff at 7%, distance learning for all courses rank just above the academic staff by 1% making it 8%, full-time postgraduate students hold one fourth of the total library users and the part-time postgraduate students contain a total of 16% of the whole library users.

The satisfaction level of the users is measured by five different factors such as library opening hours, helpfulness of staff, availability of books, availability of journals and the reliability of wi-fi. The satisfaction level of users with helpfulness of staff is 100%, in which 95% of the users are very satisfied with the staff and only 5 percent are fairly satisfied. Most of the users are generally not satisfied because of the availability of journals (about 20%), moreover only 10% of users are not satisfied with the availability of books and 19% are not satisfied with the wi-fi, other than that most of the users are satisfied with the library facilities.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main user group (full-time undergraduates, 44%) and the smallest (academic staff, 7%), and accurately report the other user shares. You also select relevant satisfaction figures, including the high rating for staff helpfulness and the dissatisfaction with journals and wi-fi. However, the overview is limited: it would be clearer to summarise the broad pattern that satisfaction is generally high, especially for staff and opening hours, while journals and wi-fi attract the most dissatisfaction. The statement that users are “generally not satisfied” because of journals overgeneralises from one category, and the final claim that most users are satisfied with facilities is not supported by a clear comparison across the table. Covering the opening-hours results would also make the account more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response is arranged in a sensible sequence: an introduction, a paragraph on user categories, and a paragraph on satisfaction. This gives the reader a clear overall route through the two visuals, and linking expressions such as “whereas,” “moreover,” and “other than that” help connect comparisons. The organisation is coherent, but the satisfaction paragraph combines several separate findings in a long sentence, making the relationships between them less clear. For example, the shift from staff helpfulness to journal dissatisfaction could be signposted more deliberately, and the opening-hours figures are omitted rather than integrated into the comparison. To strengthen progression, group the most positive results together, then contrast them with the areas receiving more negative ratings.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “majority,” “satisfaction level,” “availability,” and “reliability,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more formal reporting language, such as “illustrates” and “measured.” However, some choices are inaccurate or awkward: “ungraduate” is not the correct term, “least amount of users” is an unnatural collocation, and “contain a total of 16%” is imprecise for describing a share. Repetition of “users” and “satisfied” also limits flexibility in the final paragraph. Use standard category labels and concise expressions such as “accounted for” or “represented,” while varying terms for ratings and respondents where appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “in which 95% of the users are very satisfied” and a comparison with “whereas.” Most of the message remains understandable, but some grammatical errors and awkward constructions are present. For example, “the information … users satisfaction” needs a possessive form, and “the part-time postgraduate students contain a total of 16%” uses an unsuitable subject–verb construction. The long sentence beginning “The satisfaction level of users…” also joins several ideas with commas, weakening punctuation and control. Aim for shorter, clearly structured comparisons, and check articles, possessives, and agreement when describing percentages.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.