Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The pie chart illustrates the categories of library users which includes academic staff, distance learning, part-time and fulltime postgraduates and full-time undergraduates along wth another table which shows their satisfaction level.

The charts depicts that full-time undergraduates are highest in percentage whereas, distance learning is very low as compare to other categories. According to the survey shown in table below, illustrates that users were very satisfied in each terms and very less people were un-satisfied.

Highest number of people who visits library are full-time undergraduates with 44 percent and the second highest are 25 percent of fulltime postgraduates. Whereas, part-time postgraduates, distance learning and academic staff are relatively lower with 16, 8 and 7 percent.

The survey includes library opening hours with 65% of people were satisfied and none of them were unsatisfied but 35 percent were in-between. Most people were satisfied by helpfulness of staff with figure of 95 percent and 5 fairly satisfied. Similarly, users were 50 and 45 percent satisfied with the availibility of book and jpurnal relatively but 20 percent of them were not satisfied. Figure for reliable wifi shows 48% satisfaction, 33% fairly satsifaction and 19 % un-satisfaction.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both visuals and identify the main pattern: full-time undergraduates form the largest user group, while academic staff and distance learners are the smallest. The category figures are reported accurately, and you include useful satisfaction data, especially the 95% very satisfied with staff helpfulness and the 65% very satisfied with opening hours. However, the overview is imprecise: “users were very satisfied in each terms” overlooks that satisfaction is lower for journals and books, and the table’s “fairly satisfied” and “not satisfied” categories are not consistently distinguished. For example, the 35% for opening hours is described as “in-between,” and the book and journal figures are partly conflated. A clearer overview and more precise comparisons across all five aspects would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a generally clear sequence: it introduces the visuals, gives an overview, reports user-category proportions, and then turns to satisfaction. This makes the information understandable overall. Paragraphing is limited, however, and the progression within the satisfaction section becomes compressed: opening hours, staff, books, journals, and Wi-Fi are packed into a few long sentences. Some linking is mechanical or unclear, such as “Similarly,” which does not clearly signal the comparison being made, and “According to the survey shown in table below, illustrates” creates a broken connection between clauses. Grouping related satisfaction results and using explicit comparisons—such as contrasting staff helpfulness with journal availability—would make the organisation more controlled and the relationships between figures clearer.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “categories,” “satisfaction level,” “percentage,” and “reliable Wi-Fi,” so the meaning is generally clear. There is some variety in how you describe proportions, but several choices are inaccurate or unnatural: “very low as compare to” and “were in-between” do not express the data precisely, while “satisfied with the availability of book and journal” needs more natural phrasing. Spelling errors such as “wth,” “availibility,” “jpurnal,” and “satsifaction” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise chart language and consistent terms for the three response categories, for example “very satisfied,” “fairly satisfied,” and “not satisfied,” rather than replacing them with vague descriptions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, and the reader can usually follow the comparisons. However, some sentence structures are faulty, including “According to the survey shown in table below, illustrates,” where the introductory phrase is not connected to a grammatical main clause. Agreement and verb patterns also need attention: “The charts depicts” should use a plural verb, and “65% of people were satisfied” would be clearer as “65% were very satisfied.” Articles and plural forms are inconsistent in phrases such as “the availability of book and journal.” Several sentences join multiple figures without clear grammatical boundaries, particularly the final sentence. Practise building accurate comparison sentences with a clear subject and verb, then check agreement, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.