Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The pie chart and table illustrate the information of a university survey of library user.The details shows the figure of final result of the both data.

Overall, the pie chart describes the information of a university library user.Accordingly by the pie chart the main users of library is five that is shows the full result in percentage.In the most famous and huge users of library is full-time under graduate which is 44%.Secondly full-time post graduate which is 25% user.Part-time post graduate is 16% user.Distance learning is 8% and the lowest and last user is academic staff that is 7% library user in the university.

At the moment, the table describe the finalize score of library user satisfaction in three steps that which is very satisfied, fairly satisfied and not satisfied.The five library use give score step by step in percentage agree.

In conclusion, the pie chart and numbering table given the accurate final scores of auniversity library users.Thus the chart and table bital delightful and understanding score.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource4.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.5
Overall4.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You identify the main user groups and report their percentages accurately, including the largest group, full-time undergraduates (44%), and the smallest, academic staff (7%). However, the response only minimally covers the task because the table’s key results are not actually summarised: it names the three satisfaction categories but gives no figures or comparisons. The overview is also vague and partly repetitive, rather than highlighting the main patterns across both visuals. For example, the table shows staff helpfulness received the strongest satisfaction (95% very satisfied), while journals had the highest dissatisfaction (20%); these are important features to report. Replace the general statements about “final scores” with a concise overview and selected comparisons from the table.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is some organisation: the response begins with an introduction, discusses the pie chart, then turns to the table and ends with a conclusion. This gives the reader a basic sense of the two visuals. However, progression is limited because the pie-chart details are presented as a repetitive list, while the table paragraph does not develop any actual comparisons. Linking phrases such as “Overall,” “At the moment,” and “In conclusion” are used, but some do not express a clear relationship between ideas, and the conclusion repeats the introduction rather than synthesising the findings. Use separate, focused paragraphs for the overview and key details, and connect comparisons directly—for example, contrast staff helpfulness with journal availability.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response uses a small set of relevant terms, including “full-time undergraduate,” “distance learning,” “percentage,” and “satisfaction,” so the topic is generally recognisable. However, vocabulary is basic and repetitive, and several word choices or collocations make the meaning awkward: “most famous and huge users,” “finalize score,” and “numbering table” are not suitable descriptions of survey data. Repeated use of “user” also reduces precision; the chart describes proportions of user categories, not a sequence of individual users. Aim for accurate reporting language such as “accounted for,” “proportion,” “rating,” and “satisfaction level.” More precise vocabulary would make the comparisons clearer and more natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts a few longer sentence forms, but most sentences rely on simple structures, and frequent errors affect clarity. Examples include missing or incorrect articles and agreement in “The pie chart and table illustrate the information of a university survey of library user” and “the table describe.” Sentence boundaries and punctuation are also inconsistent, as in “Accordingly by the pie chart the main users of library is five that is shows…” Several clauses are joined without clear grammatical relationships, making the intended meaning difficult to follow. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement, articles, and sentence construction first, then use controlled comparisons such as “The proportion of undergraduates was higher than that of postgraduates.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.