Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-26

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The bar and table charts illustrate the data regarding a survey conducted among university library users.

As per the bar diagram, full-time undergraduates represents the largest proportion of library users, at 44%. Full-time postgraduates ranks second making up a quarter of total library users. On the other hand, a small proportion of users are academic staff. A similar trend is followed by distance learning which contributes merely 8%. However part-time graduates are double the proportion of distance learning.

Regarding the table which illustrates the percentage of satisfaction among library users explain that the majority of library users are very satisfied for helfulness of staff which is 95%. It is seen that 40% of library users are fairly satisfied for availability of books. However, availability of journals accounts for the lowest proportion.

To sum up, full time graduates constitutes the largest share of library users. While academic staff makes up the lowest proportion. Nevertheless, most people are satisfied with helpfulness of staff and not satisfied with availability of journals.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify several key features accurately: full-time undergraduates are the largest group at 44%, academic staff are the smallest at 7%, and staff helpfulness receives the strongest satisfaction result at 95% very satisfied. However, coverage of the table is incomplete and some comparisons are unclear. For example, saying journals have the “lowest proportion” does not specify that they have the highest dissatisfaction (20%), while opening hours (65% very satisfied) and wi-fi (48%) are not discussed. “Most people are satisfied” is also too broad without distinguishing very and fairly satisfied. The overview gives a useful summary, but fuller, more precise reporting of the satisfaction patterns is needed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, a paragraph on user categories, a paragraph on satisfaction, and a concluding summary. This makes the two visuals easy to follow, and linking expressions such as “On the other hand,” “Regarding,” and “To sum up” help signal shifts. The progression is generally coherent, though some connections are mechanical or awkward: “However part-time graduates are double…” does not clearly explain the comparison, and the table paragraph moves from staff helpfulness to books and journals without a broader organising pattern. The conclusion also repeats points already made. Grouping satisfaction results by strongest and weakest ratings, then using clearer comparisons, would make cohesion more flexible.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “largest proportion,” “contributes,” “accounts for,” and “satisfaction.” These choices generally communicate the data, and some variation avoids excessive repetition. However, several word choices or collocations are imprecise: “bar diagram” and “table charts” are less natural than “bar chart” and “table”; “full-time graduates” does not accurately name the user category; and “satisfied for helpfulness” is not idiomatic. “Merely” also adds an unnecessary evaluative tone when describing the 8% share. Spelling errors such as “helfulness” reduce accuracy. Aim for precise category labels and natural reporting phrases, especially when describing satisfaction levels.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

There is a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, and most of the meaning remains clear. You use subordinate clauses and contrast, for example, “However, part-time graduates are double…” and “While academic staff makes up…”. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly with subject–verb agreement and sentence construction. In “full-time undergraduates represents,” the plural subject requires “represent”; similarly, “full-time postgraduates ranks” should be “rank.” The sentence beginning “Regarding the table which illustrates… explain that” is structurally incomplete, and “While academic staff makes up…” is a fragment when used after a full stop. Check agreement, and ensure each sentence has a complete main clause. These issues do not usually prevent understanding.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.