Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-27

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The chart and table provides information about the results of a survey of the people who uses library at a university.

Overall, what stands out from the chart and table is that full-time undergraduate students uses library more than others and cover almost half of the proportion of survey. Helpfullness of staff get the highest rating among all others while availability of journal get the lowest.

Looking at the details, 44% of the library users study in the undergraduate program which cover almost half of the shares, while 25% of library users are full-time postgraduate students. However, part-time postgraduate students cover 16% of the share of library users and distance learning students and academic staff shows the lowest number of 8% and 7% respectively.

Regarding the other details, 65% users are very satisfied and 35% of users are fairly satisfied with the library opening hours, while library staff got 95% rating of very satisfied users and 5% of fairly satisfied. However, 50% users are very satisfied with the availability of books while 40% are fairly satisfied and 10% are not satisfied. The percentage of users who are very satisfied with the availability of journals are 45% with 35% fairly satisfied users and 20% users who are not satisfied. Lastly, reliability of wi-fi gets 48% fully satisfied users followed by 33% fairly satisfied and 19% not satisfied users.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response addresses both visuals and gives a clear overview: undergraduates form the largest user group, while staff helpfulness receives the strongest satisfaction rating and journal availability the weakest. The figures reported are accurate, and the response makes relevant comparisons, including the contrast between 95% very satisfied with staff helpfulness and 45% with journals. This supports a well-focused summary of the main features. To strengthen the account further, make the overview more precise: journals have the highest proportion of users who are not satisfied (20%), while opening hours have none, a useful contrast that is not highlighted. Also clarify that the percentages describe survey respondents or ratings, rather than implying that the library staff themselves “got” a rating.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The information is organised in a clear progression: an introduction, an overview, the user categories, and then satisfaction results. Paragraphing helps distinguish the two visuals, and linking phrases such as “Overall,” “Looking at the details,” and “Lastly” guide the reader through the report. The comparisons are generally easy to follow. Some transitions are repetitive, particularly the repeated use of “while” and “However,” and the final paragraph becomes a sequence of individual figures rather than grouping related results. For a more polished progression, compare the strongest and weakest satisfaction areas together, then summarise the remaining categories, using clearer references to each rating dimension.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for describing the charts, and terms such as “proportion,” “availability,” “very satisfied,” and “fairly satisfied” help convey the data accurately. There are also attempts at more formal reporting language. However, several choices are imprecise or awkward: “cover almost half of the proportion” is redundant, “get the highest rating” is informal, and “library staff got 95% rating” does not clearly identify whose satisfaction is being measured. Spelling also needs attention in “Helpfullness.” Aim for concise, conventional chart language and accurate collocations; this will make the report sound more natural without requiring unnecessarily complex vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses linked with “while” and “although,” and the meaning remains clear throughout. Some grammatical errors persist, especially subject–verb agreement: “The chart and table provides” should be “provide,” “people who uses” should be “people who use,” and “students uses” should be “students use.” There are also article and number-pattern issues in phrases such as “44% users” and “the undergraduate program,” where “of users” and a more precise plural reference would be appropriate. Review agreement in sentences with plural subjects and use consistent noun phrases when reporting percentages. These corrections would improve accuracy while preserving the report’s clear structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.