Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart illustrates that how frequently the library is use in university by students as well as staff.

Overall, the undergraduate students are the higly active users while the academic staff visit very less to library. The users are very satisfied with the staff but not too much satified with the availability of journals.

The library is used by various people in university. 44% users were the full-time undergraduate students while 25% were the full-time postgraduate students. Subsequently, the part-time postgraduate users were 16%. The minor users of library were include distance learning (8%) and academic staff (7%).

Furthemore, the users show their satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the varouis aspects of library. 65% users were satisfied with library opening hours while 35% were fairly satisfied. The staff behaviour is very kind because 95% users were satisfied with the helpfulness of staff. The half users were satisfied with availability of books while half were not very satisfied. For the availability of journals the satisfaction of users is quite low that is 45%, in the same manner the satisfaction on reliability of wifi is also lower which is about 48%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You cover both the user categories and satisfaction results, and your overview identifies two important contrasts: undergraduates form the largest group, while staff receive the strongest satisfaction rating and journals are less positively rated. Most figures are accurate, including the user shares and the 65%/35% split for opening hours. The main weakness is an over-generalisation in “half users were satisfied with availability of books while half were not very satisfied”: 50% were very satisfied, 40% fairly satisfied, and only 10% not satisfied. Similarly, the overview could distinguish the lower journal ratings from wi-fi, whose satisfaction is 48%. More precise reporting of the satisfaction categories would make the key comparisons better supported.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall shape: an introduction and overview are followed by one paragraph on user categories and another on satisfaction. This makes the two sets of information easy to locate, and linking expressions such as “Overall” and “Furthermore” help signal progression. However, some connections are mechanical or imprecise. “Subsequently” does not show a meaningful sequence between user groups, and “in the same manner” suggests the journal and wi-fi results are alike without explaining the comparison. The satisfaction paragraph also moves through several categories without a consistent pattern. Grouping the strongest results first, then comparing the lower ratings, and using clearer references to the table categories would make the progression more controlled.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “full-time undergraduate,” “part-time postgraduate,” “availability,” and “reliability,” so the reader can identify the categories being described. However, the range and control are limited by repeated general words such as “users,” “satisfied,” and “library,” as well as inaccurate or unnatural choices: “higly active users,” “visit very less,” and “staff behaviour is very kind.” These phrases do not precisely describe the data, which reports satisfaction with helpfulness rather than staff behaviour. Spelling errors such as “Furthemore,” “varouis,” and “satified” are also noticeable. Aim for accurate collocations and use more precise terms for proportions and satisfaction levels.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt some complex structures, including “while” comparisons and the clause beginning “because 95% users were satisfied,” but control is uneven and many sentences contain grammatical errors. For example, “illustrates that how frequently the library is use” has an incorrect clause pattern and verb form; “the minor users … were include” has faulty agreement and verb construction; and “45%, in the same manner…” creates a sentence boundary problem. Articles and prepositions are also often missing, as in “in university” and “95% users.” These errors sometimes make the relationships between ideas less clear. Practise accurate simple sentence patterns first, then add subordinate clauses while checking verb forms, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.