Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-29

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given pie chart and table illustrate the survey outcome of a library users and their satisfaction level at a university. Overall, it evidence from the pie chart that full -time undergraduate are frequent users of the library in contrast majority of the students are very satisfied due to getting help from the staff.

From the chart, around 44% of full-time undergraduate are used library which demonstrate the giant proportion among the other users. While nearly 25% student whom are doing full-time postgraduate uses library. However. moderate level of students from part-time postgraduate are using library which is 16%. And there are slightly difference shows among the academic staff and Distance learning when using library.

Furthermore, the table demonstrate the about 95% student feel very satisfied because of staff helpfulness while 20% are not satisfied for journals availability but 45% rating very satisfied for this 65% rating very satisfied at library opening hours only 35% rating fairly satisfied. 48% rating very satisfied for reliability of wi-fi only 19% shows not satisfied. About half of the student are very satisfied for the availability of books.

Therefore, both table and pie chart shows the different rating of satisfactions and users of library.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main user group correctly: full-time undergraduates account for 44%, and you note that staff helpfulness receives the strongest satisfaction rating. You also include several relevant figures from both visuals. However, the overview is unclear and does not bring together the main patterns, while some comparisons are incomplete: for example, academic staff (7%) and distance learners (8%) are described only as showing a “slightly difference.” The table discussion also becomes difficult to follow when figures are combined in one sentence, and the 45% very satisfied rating for journals is not clearly reported. A clearer overview contrasting user proportions with satisfaction results, followed by accurately grouped comparisons, would make the response more complete and developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic structure, moving from an introduction and overview to the user categories and then the satisfaction table. This gives the reader a general sense of the two visuals. However, progression within paragraphs is uneven, especially in the table paragraph, where staff helpfulness, journals, opening hours and wi-fi are joined in a long, confusing sequence. Connectors such as “Furthermore,” “However,” and “Therefore” are used, but they do not always clarify the relationship between ideas; “However” does not introduce a clear contrast in the user-category paragraph. Separate each satisfaction feature into a clear comparison and use referencing consistently. This would improve the organisation and reduce the effort needed to follow the figures.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “full-time undergraduate,” “satisfied,” “availability,” and “reliability of wi-fi,” so the topic is generally clear. There are also attempts at more descriptive wording, such as “giant proportion,” but this is not a natural choice for reporting chart data. Several word forms and collocations are inaccurate, including “survey outcome of a library users,” “moderate level of students,” and “rating very satisfied.” Repetition of “satisfied” and “library” also limits flexibility. Choose precise, conventional expressions for proportions and ratings, such as “accounted for,” “a smaller share,” and “were very satisfied.” More accurate collocations would make the information easier to understand.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a contrast with “while” and a clause beginning “because of.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors sometimes make relationships between figures difficult to interpret. Examples include “a library users,” “full-time undergraduate are used library,” and “the table demonstrate,” which show problems with articles, verb forms and subject–verb agreement. Sentence boundaries and punctuation also need attention: the long sentence beginning “Furthermore” runs several separate comparisons together, and “However.” is incorrectly punctuated as a standalone fragment. Build shorter, complete sentences first, checking agreement and verb forms, then add subordinate clauses where they clearly express a comparison or reason.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.